From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace hardcoded value 0 for the initial value for SPTE
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:44:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240507154459.3950778-3-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507154459.3950778-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
The TDX support will need the "suppress #VE" bit (bit 63) set as the
initial value for SPTE. To reduce code change size, introduce a new macro
SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE for the initial value for the shadow page table
entry (SPTE) and replace hard-coded value 0 for it. Initialize shadow page
tables with their value.
The plan is to unconditionally set the "suppress #VE" bit for both AMD and
Intel as: 1) AMD hardware uses the bit 63 as NX for present SPTE and
ignored for non-present SPTE; 2) for conventional VMX guests, KVM never
enables the "EPT-violation #VE" in VMCS control and "suppress #VE" bit is
ignored by hardware.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Message-Id: <acdf09bf60cad12c495005bf3495c54f6b3069c9.1705965635.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
[Remove unnecessary CONFIG_X86_64 check. - Paolo]
Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 14 +++++++++-----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 4 +++-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 12 ++++++------
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 08900a0563f9..fbfdc606f1f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -567,9 +567,9 @@ static u64 mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte) ||
!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
- __update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, 0ull);
+ __update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
else
- old_spte = __update_clear_spte_slow(sptep, 0ull);
+ old_spte = __update_clear_spte_slow(sptep, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
return old_spte;
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static u64 mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
*/
static void mmu_spte_clear_no_track(u64 *sptep)
{
- __update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, 0ull);
+ __update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
}
static u64 mmu_spte_get_lockless(u64 *sptep)
@@ -1897,7 +1897,8 @@ static bool kvm_sync_page_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
static int kvm_sync_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int i)
{
- if (!sp->spt[i])
+ /* sp->spt[i] has initial value of shadow page table allocation */
+ if (sp->spt[i] == SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE)
return 0;
return vcpu->arch.mmu->sync_spte(vcpu, sp, i);
@@ -6120,7 +6121,10 @@ int kvm_mmu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache.kmem_cache = mmu_page_header_cache;
vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
- vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
+ vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache.init_value =
+ SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE;
+ if (!vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache.init_value)
+ vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
vcpu->arch.mmu = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
vcpu->arch.walk_mmu = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index 4d4e98fe4f35..bebd73cd61bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ static int FNAME(sync_spte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int
gpa_t pte_gpa;
gfn_t gfn;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!sp->spt[i]))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(sp->spt[i] == SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE))
return 0;
first_pte_gpa = FNAME(get_level1_sp_gpa)(sp);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index f5c600c52f83..0f4ec2859474 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ static_assert(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_BITS == 8 && MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_BITS == 11);
#define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_MASK GENMASK_ULL(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_BITS + MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_BITS - 1, 0)
+#define SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE 0ULL
+
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_host_writable_mask;
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmu_writable_mask;
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nx_mask;
@@ -194,7 +196,7 @@ extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_mask;
*
* Only used by the TDP MMU.
*/
-#define REMOVED_SPTE 0x5a0ULL
+#define REMOVED_SPTE (SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE | 0x5a0ULL)
/* Removed SPTEs must not be misconstrued as shadow present PTEs. */
static_assert(!(REMOVED_SPTE & SPTE_MMU_PRESENT_MASK));
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index c6192a52bd31..f5401967897a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
* here since the SPTE is going from non-present to non-present. Use
* the raw write helper to avoid an unnecessary check on volatile bits.
*/
- __kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, 0);
+ __kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
return 0;
}
@@ -740,8 +740,8 @@ static void __tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
continue;
if (!shared)
- tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
- else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, 0))
+ tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
+ else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE))
goto retry;
}
}
@@ -808,8 +808,8 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte)))
return false;
- tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), sp->ptep, old_spte, 0,
- sp->gfn, sp->role.level + 1);
+ tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), sp->ptep, old_spte,
+ SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE, sp->gfn, sp->role.level + 1);
return true;
}
@@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
!is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
continue;
- tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
+ tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
/*
* Zappings SPTEs in invalid roots doesn't require a TLB flush,
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-07 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-07 15:44 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: MMU changes for TDX VE support Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: Allow page-sized MMU caches to be initialized with custom 64-bit values Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:44 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2024-05-15 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace hardcoded value 0 for the initial value for SPTE Isaku Yamahata
2024-05-15 17:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow non-zero value for non-present SPTE and removed SPTE Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Add Suppress VE bit to EPT shadow_mmio_mask/shadow_present_mask Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Track shadow MMIO value on a per-VM basis Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM, x86: add architectural support code for #VE Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: VMX: Introduce test mode related to EPT violation VE Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-15 23:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-17 1:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-17 9:56 ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-05-17 16:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-17 16:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-17 16:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-17 17:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-17 18:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-17 22:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240507154459.3950778-3-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®