mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 11:41:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240516094137.GI22557@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240515144311.16038-5-frederic@kernel.org>

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 04:43:11PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The perf pending task work is never waited upon the matching event
> release. In the case of a child event, released via free_event()
> directly, this can potentially result in a leaked event, such as in the
> following scenario that doesn't even require a weak IRQ work
> implementation to trigger:
> 
> schedule()
>    prepare_task_switch()
> =======> <NMI>
>       perf_event_overflow()
>          event->pending_sigtrap = ...
>          irq_work_queue(&event->pending_irq)
> <======= </NMI>
>       perf_event_task_sched_out()
>           event_sched_out()
>               event->pending_sigtrap = 0;
>               atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&event->refcount)
>               task_work_add(&event->pending_task)
>    finish_lock_switch()
> =======> <IRQ>
>    perf_pending_irq()
>       //do nothing, rely on pending task work
> <======= </IRQ>
> 
> begin_new_exec()
>    perf_event_exit_task()
>       perf_event_exit_event()
>          // If is child event
>          free_event()
>             WARN(atomic_long_cmpxchg(&event->refcount, 1, 0) != 1)
>             // event is leaked
> 
> Similar scenarios can also happen with perf_event_remove_on_exec() or
> simply against concurrent perf_event_release().
> 
> Fix this with synchonizing against the possibly remaining pending task
> work while freeing the event, just like is done with remaining pending
> IRQ work. This means that the pending task callback neither need nor
> should hold a reference to the event, preventing it from ever beeing
> freed.
> 
> Fixes: 517e6a301f34 ("perf: Fix perf_pending_task() UaF")
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

Yeah, I suppose this'll do. Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-16  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-15 14:43 [PATCH 0/4 v2] perf: Fix leaked sigtrap events Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 14:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: s/task_work_cancel()/task_work_cancel_func()/ Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 14:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: Introduce task_work_cancel() again Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 14:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: Fix event leak upon exit Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16  9:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-16 11:17     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 14:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16  9:41   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-21  9:15 [PATCH 0/4 v4] perf: Fix leaked sigtrap events Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-21  9:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16 14:09 [PATCH 0/4 v3] perf: Fix leaked sigtrap events Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16 14:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release Frederic Weisbecker
2024-03-29 23:58 [PATCH 0/4] perf: Fix leaked events when sigtrap = 1 Frederic Weisbecker
2024-03-29 23:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240516094137.GI22557@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome