From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: x86: Fixes for KVM_INTEL_PROVE_VE
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 17:04:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240518000430.1118488-1-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
Fixes and debug help for prove #VE support. I'm not in love with the sanity
check implementation, but I also don't love the idea of plumbing in @kvm to
the low level SPTE helpers.
Not super well tested, but I wanted to get this posted asap in case someone
wants to debug the unexpected #VEs we're seeing.
Note, Isaku's patch needs his SoB.
Isaku Yamahata (1):
KVM: x86/mmu: Use SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE for atomic zap in TDP MMU
Sean Christopherson (8):
KVM: nVMX: Initialize #VE info page for vmcs02 when proving #VE
support
KVM: nVMX: Always handle #VEs in L0 (never forward #VEs from L2 to L1)
KVM: x86/mmu: Add sanity checks that KVM doesn't create EPT #VE SPTEs
KVM: VMX: Dump VMCS on unexpected #VE
KVM: x86/mmu: Print SPTEs on unexpected #VE
KVM: VMX: Don't kill the VM on an unexpected #VE
KVM: VMX: Enumerate EPT Violation #VE support in /proc/cpuinfo
KVM: x86: Disable KVM_INTEL_PROVE_VE by default
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/vmxfeatures.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 6 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 9 ++++++
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 5 ++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 11 ++++++--
9 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
base-commit: 4aad0b1893a141f114ba40ed509066f3c9bc24b0
--
2.45.0.215.g3402c0e53f-goog
next reply other threads:[~2024-05-18 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-18 0:04 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-05-18 0:04 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Use SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE for atomic zap in TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2024-05-20 12:38 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-21 7:21 ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-05-18 0:04 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: nVMX: Initialize #VE info page for vmcs02 when proving #VE support Sean Christopherson
2024-05-20 23:09 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-20 23:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-20 23:49 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-21 0:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-21 0:42 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-21 1:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-18 0:04 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: nVMX: Always handle #VEs in L0 (never forward #VEs from L2 to L1) Sean Christopherson
2024-05-18 0:04 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Add sanity checks that KVM doesn't create EPT #VE SPTEs Sean Christopherson
2024-05-18 0:04 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: VMX: Dump VMCS on unexpected #VE Sean Christopherson
2024-05-18 0:04 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Print SPTEs " Sean Christopherson
2024-05-18 0:04 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: VMX: Don't kill the VM on an " Sean Christopherson
2024-05-18 0:04 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: VMX: Enumerate EPT Violation #VE support in /proc/cpuinfo Sean Christopherson
2024-05-18 0:04 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: Disable KVM_INTEL_PROVE_VE by default Sean Christopherson
2024-05-21 17:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-21 18:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-21 20:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-22 0:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-23 16:41 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM: x86: Fixes for KVM_INTEL_PROVE_VE Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240518000430.1118488-1-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®