From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
dsahern@kernel.org, ncardwell@google.com, soheil@google.com,
mfreemon@cloudflare.com, lixiaoyan@google.com,
david.laight@aculab.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn, fan.yu9@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] icmp: Add icmp_timestamp_ignore_all to control ICMP_TIMESTAMP
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 05:34:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202405180527.iGJVxmda-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240517172639229ec5bN7VBV7SGEHkSK5K6f@zte.com.cn>
Hi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/ye-xingchen-zte-com-cn/icmp-Add-icmp_timestamp_ignore_all-to-control-ICMP_TIMESTAMP/20240517-172903
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240517172639229ec5bN7VBV7SGEHkSK5K6f%40zte.com.cn
patch subject: [PATCH net-next] icmp: Add icmp_timestamp_ignore_all to control ICMP_TIMESTAMP
config: arc-vdk_hs38_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240518/202405180527.iGJVxmda-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240518/202405180527.iGJVxmda-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405180527.iGJVxmda-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from ./arch/arc/include/generated/asm/rwonce.h:1,
from include/linux/compiler.h:299,
from include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
from include/linux/container_of.h:5,
from include/linux/list.h:5,
from include/linux/module.h:12,
from net/ipv4/icmp.c:62:
net/ipv4/icmp.c: In function 'icmp_timestamp':
>> include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:44:71: warning: 'net' is used uninitialized [-Wuninitialized]
44 | #define __READ_ONCE(x) (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x))
| ^~~~
include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro '__READ_ONCE'
50 | __READ_ONCE(x); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
net/ipv4/icmp.c:1157:13: note: in expansion of macro 'READ_ONCE'
1157 | if (READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_timestamp_ignore_all))
| ^~~~~~~~~
net/ipv4/icmp.c:1155:21: note: 'net' was declared here
1155 | struct net *net;
| ^~~
vim +/net +44 include/asm-generic/rwonce.h
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 28
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 29 /*
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 30 * Yes, this permits 64-bit accesses on 32-bit architectures. These will
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 31 * actually be atomic in some cases (namely Armv7 + LPAE), but for others we
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 32 * rely on the access being split into 2x32-bit accesses for a 32-bit quantity
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 33 * (e.g. a virtual address) and a strong prevailing wind.
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 34 */
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 35 #define compiletime_assert_rwonce_type(t) \
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 36 compiletime_assert(__native_word(t) || sizeof(t) == sizeof(long long), \
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 37 "Unsupported access size for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE().")
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 38
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 39 /*
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 40 * Use __READ_ONCE() instead of READ_ONCE() if you do not require any
3c9184109e78ea2 Will Deacon 2019-10-30 41 * atomicity. Note that this may result in tears!
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 42 */
b78b331a3f5c077 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 43 #ifndef __READ_ONCE
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 @44 #define __READ_ONCE(x) (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x))
b78b331a3f5c077 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 45 #endif
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 46
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-17 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-17 9:26 ye.xingchen
2024-05-17 21:34 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-05-17 21:34 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202405180527.iGJVxmda-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fan.yu9@zte.com.cn \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixiaoyan@google.com \
--cc=mfreemon@cloudflare.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn \
--cc=zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®