From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 507D517FF; Thu, 23 May 2024 00:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716422463; cv=none; b=SksrW7BtlElgk26KdMcEMI+UVpSedV+4i7zNMJugvmo3GSpBFA0cn4JWU3lZSB+2yBiKvlPvA9PlJtCObRBrenn5CUqrbiKJGlqu+Q2IBchPzgy0kgZSzxRz1U2FwlclbGt+mJ34Dg9mxVRctX4iUuJfPTn5eK46nQPbl/7kQJ8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716422463; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BZ+7rdCk+IntnuBSK4LDC88qXx4JwQPsKs5wSrREZhM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=O2PFS8+09EPer50+Q5mSsLwq5oxtX8xHD3vb6ulm/JJzQTGmW8p5DK7tayUgUlJS8HOwR3wdouP0WfhY8XrAx64opiyvKGR/BnlaLBITO2hKfa5wUmDBpEzGoWSN80wCFdhcCxT5bGIs7OAqfU/bOElNicm/pw6qTBpxMyfXYGI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=R/iPEnmF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="R/iPEnmF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1716422461; x=1747958461; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=BZ+7rdCk+IntnuBSK4LDC88qXx4JwQPsKs5wSrREZhM=; b=R/iPEnmFavdV6xeDF3WC3xqxSOm9mZqGV7918sIl0zHos0ClxtRY+XcU 6L5xOEIM0XLtZNKOAb9vMzYI3Js5Tqz3U4nqMkBYTveWJxP5L+1jqnVDr QwyRLcVj3fo3Tt8hmx1aJNtUmLz/F6bORmT8UuFNbI40cBsIQvX4cC0sY FuZcrXeHJxH6hpAf0Ieu/TAPB8+TelO6pGg7s7q/Al+SvwCEYVeT+5b9s HpLi5dvhtUy5ZK4nsnxvpeh4SaO0ZmdWCtAKSZzWfQMVZEQqVrmtDAA/Q siv75hN1uLZ5CyBp6KxsTmZuHeH053JOjCrcnugAkmvA3Ojf0cmm5ANe7 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: g4yuMW90Qf21ryp5IKk36Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Whfb7xkKR5KcVzAiI+YKgg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11080"; a="24119363" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,181,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="24119363" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 May 2024 17:01:00 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: SofhWmZ1QcKnKRKkbNhunA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0s3Cl7JQQ9+C2kwjCpjErw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,181,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="33363914" Received: from ls.sc.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([172.25.112.54]) by fmviesa007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 May 2024 17:01:00 -0700 Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 17:01:00 -0700 From: Isaku Yamahata To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" Cc: "Yamahata, Isaku" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "seanjc@google.com" , "Huang, Kai" , "sagis@google.com" , "isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Zhao, Yan Y" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "dmatlack@google.com" , "isaku.yamahata@gmail.com" , "Aktas, Erdem" Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Support TDX private mapping for TDP MMU Message-ID: <20240523000100.GE212599@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20240517090348.GN168153@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> <20240517191630.GC412700@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> <20240520233227.GA29916@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> <20240521161520.GB212599@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> <20240522223413.GC212599@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> <9bc661643e3ce11f32f0bac78a2dbfd62d9cd283.camel@intel.com> <20240522234754.GD212599@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> <4a6e393c6a1f99ee45b9020fbd2ac70f48c980b4.camel@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4a6e393c6a1f99ee45b9020fbd2ac70f48c980b4.camel@intel.com> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 11:50:58PM +0000, "Edgecombe, Rick P" wrote: > On Wed, 2024-05-22 at 16:47 -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > > > How about we leave option 1 as a separate patch and note it is not > > > functionally > > > required? Then we can shed it if needed. At the least it can serve as a > > > conversation piece in the meantime. > > > > Ok. We understand the situation correctly. I think it's okay to do nothing for > > now with some notes somewhere as record because it doesn't affect much for > > usual > > case. > > I meant we include your proposed option 1 as a separate patch in the next > series. I'm writing am currently writing a log for the iterator changes, and > I'll note it as an issue. And then we include this later in the same series. No? Ok, Let's include the patch. -- Isaku Yamahata