From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B70F171B0 for ; Sun, 26 May 2024 14:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716733402; cv=none; b=WdvUMXP3HKXoBjMJ0IjzgIMW3fDSvusvEbdbEi9k9I7hGT/eB5e1yn1dZADRHqGMuKEG03hiNNUMBXCAaHuxQRMsc/51etSY9ydhaZRdzDButJ0ZIuD+GShswZGbO7nd4ENHKCI5UyShIUcvVLhkGtN4cRFsPFYWQD9symw1byQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716733402; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0Htsacbl71hMZ/JTxhHysgW2DC0GjMffsquDYGrL/oU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VHj5hPfmZXP7FYDwYYwdCSaP/PhRx1tjY2Qhx/MLcSkwU4izA/MaoNBAtDKA9PiDm/EGIqiYKwWORcP6DLQz7V1P0EPLY1oKmrcXcIX0l6S6CUb8fsGrcZ6GSyv4kWzpWcQFX/sohYgzo2FHE97HdDj6qDO2AX9dFP95Zr9CuFk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=ZSqgDlld; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=5YvxaNoY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ZSqgDlld"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="5YvxaNoY" Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 16:23:11 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1716733398; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xnCZ27QyK1irI3tnt2syPDNGF9wfvIINvO/4hdl5qxk=; b=ZSqgDlldMYgaRq0ImxIGO8GhOkh2H5EfzkftWY6MUNgx/osEHiJgmrLdPyY2XcLL3q0byq gtIF3SAPVCnuAzVyF6XHvxa7DJBSjTs9Ku8wI2qQYT7pMDRhj4pY2w180Ah+FcEHvjw8M8 FkgvLgLyTuqrgyLoA+/qRTWTpJkfUDmyvMM5WW7cOj+7Nbj9CRPWFQhAGRgbGr0Xa8ejfj 0EWrRJYXMOjWHB22Hpx8iuGGpkOcyXV9HEZmIT84tKBFwG2eMw5GUvTz3IbovU6jeD+sxZ C5RAhff1jQ1wq06Bw3gGOXCure/kmkbtDO82K4d3zIIppo0ZDig1Z87Qo5S84A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1716733398; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xnCZ27QyK1irI3tnt2syPDNGF9wfvIINvO/4hdl5qxk=; b=5YvxaNoYNyYciKG2s/KkZerhDtblGES6SSQquaBB7zdwzPPajujWBUhNRw36PPQtQqnlp+ WpVW1Ap1UN0yw4Ag== From: Nam Cao To: Michael Straube Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: rtl8192e: reduce indentation level Message-ID: <20240526142311.e1zY6b-Z@linutronix.de> References: <20240526111928.14574-1-straube.linux@gmail.com> <20240526111928.14574-2-straube.linux@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240526111928.14574-2-straube.linux@gmail.com> On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote: > Reduce indentation level in _rtl92e_dm_rx_path_sel_byrssi() by negating > if statements and use continue in for loops. This way the indentation > level of the code that is covered by the if checks can be reduced. This > improves readability and clears two checkpatch warnings. > > WARNING: Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring > > Signed-off-by: Michael Straube I don't see any functional change. This patch does as described: Reviewed-by: Nam Cao Best regards, Nam