From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 2/2] doc: Clarify rcu_assign_pointer() and rcu_dereference() ordering
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:21:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240604222155.2370541-2-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5dc5f14-04c1-494b-9044-e837279a7bcd@paulmck-laptop>
This commit expands on the ordering properties of rcu_assign_pointer()
and rcu_dereference(), outlining their constraints on CPUs and compilers.
Reported-by: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
index 94838c65c7d97..d585a5490aeec 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
@@ -250,21 +250,25 @@ rcu_assign_pointer()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
void rcu_assign_pointer(p, typeof(p) v);
- Yes, rcu_assign_pointer() **is** implemented as a macro, though it
- would be cool to be able to declare a function in this manner.
- (Compiler experts will no doubt disagree.)
+ Yes, rcu_assign_pointer() **is** implemented as a macro, though
+ it would be cool to be able to declare a function in this manner.
+ (And there has been some discussion of adding overloaded functions
+ to the C language, so who knows?)
The updater uses this spatial macro to assign a new value to an
RCU-protected pointer, in order to safely communicate the change
in value from the updater to the reader. This is a spatial (as
opposed to temporal) macro. It does not evaluate to an rvalue,
- but it does execute any memory-barrier instructions required
- for a given CPU architecture. Its ordering properties are that
- of a store-release operation.
-
- Perhaps just as important, it serves to document (1) which
- pointers are protected by RCU and (2) the point at which a
- given structure becomes accessible to other CPUs. That said,
+ but it does provide any compiler directives and memory-barrier
+ instructions required for a given compile or CPU architecture.
+ Its ordering properties are that of a store-release operation,
+ that is, any prior loads and stores required to initialize the
+ structure are ordered before the store that publishes the pointer
+ to that structure.
+
+ Perhaps just as important, rcu_assign_pointer() serves to document
+ (1) which pointers are protected by RCU and (2) the point at which
+ a given structure becomes accessible to other CPUs. That said,
rcu_assign_pointer() is most frequently used indirectly, via
the _rcu list-manipulation primitives such as list_add_rcu().
@@ -283,7 +287,11 @@ rcu_dereference()
executes any needed memory-barrier instructions for a given
CPU architecture. Currently, only Alpha needs memory barriers
within rcu_dereference() -- on other CPUs, it compiles to a
- volatile load.
+ volatile load. However, no mainstream C compilers respect
+ address dependencies, so rcu_dereference() uses volatile casts,
+ which, in combination with the coding guidelines listed in
+ rcu_dereference.rst, prevent current compilers from breaking
+ these dependencies.
Common coding practice uses rcu_dereference() to copy an
RCU-protected pointer to a local variable, then dereferences
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-04 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-04 22:21 [PATCH rcu 0/2] RCU documentation updates for v6.11 Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-04 22:21 ` [PATCH rcu 1/2] doc: Update Tasks RCU and Tasks Rude RCU description in Requirements.rst Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-05 11:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-05 18:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-04 22:21 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2024-06-05 11:56 ` [PATCH rcu 2/2] doc: Clarify rcu_assign_pointer() and rcu_dereference() ordering Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-05 18:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240604222155.2370541-2-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rao.shoaib@oracle.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®