mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hexue <xue01.he@samsung.com>
To: hch@infradead.org
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] block: Avoid polling configuration errors
Date: Wed,  5 Jun 2024 17:01:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240605090141.3873159-1-xue01.he@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZlrQCaR6xEaghWdQ@infradead.org>

On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 00:38:49 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:10:15PM +0800, hexue wrote:
>> Here's a misconfigured if application is doing polled IO
>> for devices that don't have a poll queue, the process will
>> continue to do syscall between user space and kernel space,
>> as in normal poll IO, CPU utilization will be 100%. IO actually
>> arrives through interruption.
>> 
>> This patch returns a signal that does not support the operation
>> when the underlying device does not have a poll queue, avoiding
>> performance and CPU simultaneous loss.
>
>This feels like the wrong place to check for this.
>
>As we've dropped synchronous polling we now only support
>thead based polling, right now only through io_uring.
>
>So we need to ensure REQ_POLLED doesn't even get set for any
>other I/O.

Sorry I'm not entirely clear on the impact of REQ_POLLED in this context.
I searched that REQ_POLLED is set for request if polled in io_uring or
io_uring_cmd, but here we just judge the state of request_queue.

Do you mean making this judgment here may not be a good choice, because
it may affect other IO (by same path), and this change should be just
targeted at io_uring?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-06  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20240531091021epcas5p48fdbd6302bec7a91ff66272c600b0dab@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-05-31  9:10 ` hexue
2024-06-01  7:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]     ` <CGME20240605090147epcas5p243e0e3fa55f586adf5f6c2e539a6d9fc@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-06-05  9:01       ` hexue [this message]
2024-06-12 20:53     ` Jens Axboe
2024-06-13  8:07       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-16  2:39         ` Jens Axboe
     [not found]           ` <CGME20240619063854epcas5p2d20a854d5e73a5f68f899dad45900cc0@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-06-19  6:38             ` hexue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240605090141.3873159-1-xue01.he@samsung.com \
    --to=xue01.he@samsung.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®