From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E75561FF3; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 03:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717556913; cv=none; b=shU7zWqZu4Lu9yeU25J/zashLO9vfRXBgCYygcRL1zDDcNKk75PezIW/+SM2ziKHvTmXfLbmeQYkvXPbvjBrTnHUpNqpmo/ZMhZHtzjnB6bsJg9/wVBfWKqp+KT5AqRCCo64Lfc7ZmpOvGwhxxelK2e5CPmEe0y1v4b7XxA+fao= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717556913; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v9/EYBr9mPsr5ufsnMWdpGRxyzDcht+E82KfMBBjImU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nczTN+rLiNfxGu3E+KHzOhBqMcsexwNYJkPBhbyTNUT5XaeBDo8DO9dZuJnCEf7xuKOjjEVBPU5CcZrpCUNQClVNPozfs+JEgREq6MlDD5aliQ1qr6HJJF6mR/wukqBUa7mYMOytbs1Ydy0ftBxYOdgjklRXzuZwHnSG02pLj68= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bBYBhuJl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bBYBhuJl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1717556912; x=1749092912; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=v9/EYBr9mPsr5ufsnMWdpGRxyzDcht+E82KfMBBjImU=; b=bBYBhuJlOZ7ZrvgIVmIgOuCzgyjs8iRlEmhwMq4yi34E9KlgztwXRRgt TtGfpY4lPSz1BWpYH8p9MPSpcK9Wvydq/dDVJefk3uXN+O/l6xryth+Ep UGewLFtZKdgT4esfHJCtSNYIUUJ78rzZnRT79a9WSM5vUacOza2ssYD1p xL7ZVtJadhdFbcP1rIcetBpCQFXgD3Y/jg+HvZ8EQCqChRVzD+8YjxNCl Q5qst3H9+V6YVs0j3NJQLcVG4FDcYNCrc8+kzMs42TG4OX8iGC/2QNe5I tZg1+pFbZYI2EOcVSIw8DCsxiCQk8jO+W7i+F3mbHF/ppnunc/HB9JTk+ w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 7f0qoeNUQiWNPdoIfrtk2w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6BgoYxjoR32+EtlJLRc8MQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11093"; a="13980810" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,215,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="13980810" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jun 2024 20:08:31 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LzFqRSULQSCzNjKDeyg6Cw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uxo3awcKQhODJQ52+l7lpQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,215,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="37559640" Received: from unknown (HELO 0610945e7d16) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2024 20:08:27 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 0610945e7d16 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sEh0j-0000qh-1R; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 03:08:25 +0000 Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:07:58 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Zqiang , paulmck@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, urezki@gmail.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhixu.liu@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb() Message-ID: <202406051045.FpU0Oi69-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240604085401.14733-1-qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240604085401.14733-1-qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com> Hi Zqiang, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on paulmck-rcu/dev] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.10-rc2 next-20240604] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Zqiang/rcu-tasks-Fix-access-non-existent-percpu-rtpcp-variable-in-rcu_tasks_need_gpcb/20240604-165702 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240604085401.14733-1-qiang.zhang1211%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb() config: loongarch-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240605/202406051045.FpU0Oi69-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240605/202406051045.FpU0Oi69-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406051045.FpU0Oi69-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/rcu/update.o: warning: objtool: unexpected relocation symbol type in .rela.discard.unreachable -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki