From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kunit/overflow: Adjust for __counted_by with DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:23:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240610182301.work.272-kees@kernel.org> (raw)
When a flexible array structure has a __counted_by annotation, its use
with DEFINE_RAW_FLEX() will result in the count being zero-initialized.
This is expected since one doesn't want to use RAW with a counted_by
struct. Adjust the tests to check for the condition and for compiler
support.
Reported-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0bfc6b38-8bc5-4971-b6fb-dc642a73fbfe@gmail.com/
Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
---
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
---
lib/overflow_kunit.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/overflow_kunit.c b/lib/overflow_kunit.c
index 4ef31b0bb74d..d305b0c054bb 100644
--- a/lib/overflow_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/overflow_kunit.c
@@ -1178,14 +1178,28 @@ struct foo {
s16 array[] __counted_by(counter);
};
+struct bar {
+ int a;
+ u32 counter;
+ s16 array[];
+};
+
static void DEFINE_FLEX_test(struct kunit *test)
{
- DEFINE_RAW_FLEX(struct foo, two, array, 2);
+ /* Using _RAW_ on a __counted_by struct will initialize "counter" to zero */
+ DEFINE_RAW_FLEX(struct foo, two_but_zero, array, 2);
+#if __has_attribute(__counted_by__)
+ int expected_raw_size = sizeof(struct foo);
+#else
+ int expected_raw_size = sizeof(struct foo) + 2 * sizeof(s16);
+#endif
+ /* Without annotation, it will always be on-stack size. */
+ DEFINE_RAW_FLEX(struct bar, two, array, 2);
DEFINE_FLEX(struct foo, eight, array, counter, 8);
DEFINE_FLEX(struct foo, empty, array, counter, 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, __struct_size(two),
- sizeof(struct foo) + sizeof(s16) + sizeof(s16));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, __struct_size(two_but_zero), expected_raw_size);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, __struct_size(two), sizeof(struct bar) + 2 * sizeof(s16));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, __struct_size(eight), 24);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, __struct_size(empty), sizeof(struct foo));
}
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 18:23 Kees Cook [this message]
2024-06-10 18:33 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-06-10 19:20 ` Christian Schrefl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240610182301.work.272-kees@kernel.org \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®