From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>
Cc: dvyukov@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de,
elver@google.com, glider@google.com, syzkaller@googlegroups.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kcov: don't lose track of remote references during softirqs
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:51:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240611115133.fa80466e924ad34ed4ad73cb@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240611133229.527822-1-nogikh@google.com>
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:32:29 +0200 Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com> wrote:
> In kcov_remote_start()/kcov_remote_stop(), we swap the previous KCOV
> metadata of the current task into a per-CPU variable. However, the
> kcov_mode_enabled(mode) check is not sufficient in the case of remote
> KCOV coverage: current->kcov_mode always remains KCOV_MODE_DISABLED
> for remote KCOV objects.
>
> If the original task that has invoked the KCOV_REMOTE_ENABLE ioctl
> happens to get interrupted and kcov_remote_start() is called, it
> ultimately leads to kcov_remote_stop() NOT restoring the original
> KCOV reference. So when the task exits, all registered remote KCOV
> handles remain active forever.
>
> Fix it by introducing a special kcov_mode that is assigned to the
> task that owns a KCOV remote object. It makes kcov_mode_enabled()
> return true and yet does not trigger coverage collection in
> __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() and write_comp_data().
What are the userspace visible effects of this bug? I *think* it's
just an efficiency thing, but how significant? In other words, should
we backport this fix?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-11 13:32 Aleksandr Nogikh
2024-06-11 13:33 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-06-11 18:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-06-12 10:11 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
2024-06-13 22:12 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-06-13 23:02 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-06-14 17:13 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240611115133.fa80466e924ad34ed4ad73cb@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nogikh@google.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®