From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>
To: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Subject: [PATCH] pwm: Drop pwm_apply_state()
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 17:46:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240614154603.689727-2-ukleinek@kernel.org> (raw)
This function is not supposed to be used any more since commit
c748a6d77c06 ("pwm: Rename pwm_apply_state() to
pwm_apply_might_sleep()") that is included in v6.8-rc1. Two kernel
releases should be enough for everyone to adapt, so drop the old
function that was introduced as a compatibility stub for the transition.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
---
Hello,
with Sean patch fixing ts-nbus[1], the last user of pwm_apply_state() is
gone, so pwm_apply_state() can be dropped now.
Thanks for reminding me of this task.
Best regards
Uwe
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/20240614090829.560605-1-sean@mess.org
include/linux/pwm.h | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index 75ad0d2fd949..f8c2dc12dbd3 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -563,13 +563,6 @@ static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm)
pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state);
}
-/* only for backwards-compatibility, new code should not use this */
-static inline int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm,
- const struct pwm_state *state)
-{
- return pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, state);
-}
-
struct pwm_lookup {
struct list_head list;
const char *provider;
base-commit: 1613e604df0cd359cf2a7fbd9be7a0bcfacfabd0
prerequisite-patch-id: 51738c9613a88df12ce0963aa6bdb92fa15262e1
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2024-06-14 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240614154603.689727-2-ukleinek@kernel.org \
--to=ukleinek@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean@mess.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®