From: Yifan Hong <elsk@google.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Yifan Hong <elsk@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kconfig: Prevent segfault when getting filename
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:56:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240618185609.4096399-1-elsk@google.com> (raw)
... and lineno in recursive checks.
If the following snippet is found in Kconfig:
config FOO
tristate
depends on BAR
select BAR
help
foo
... without BAR defined; then if one runs
`make tinyconfig`, there is a segfault.
Kconfig:34:error: recursive dependency detected!
Kconfig:34: symbol FOO depends on BAR
make[4]: *** [scripts/kconfig/Makefile:85: allnoconfig] Segmentation fault
This is because of the following. BAR is
a fake entry created by sym_lookup() with prop
being NULL. In the recursive check, there is a
NULL check for prop to fall back to
stack->sym->prop if stack->prop is NULL. However,
in this case, stack->sym points to the fake BAR
entry created by sym_lookup(), so prop is still
NULL. prop was then referenced without additional
NULL checks, causing segfault.
Similarly, menu is also accessed without NULL
checks. However, sym_lookup() creates entry
that is not a choice, so technically it shouldn't
fall into the state where menu is NULL for
choices. But I mechnically apply the NULL check
anyways for completeness.
This mechnical patch avoids the segfault. The
above snippet produces the following error with
this patch:
Kconfig:34:error: recursive dependency detected!
Kconfig:34: symbol FOO depends on BAR
???:-1: symbol BAR is selected by FOO
That being said, I am not sure if it is the right
fix conceptually and in functionality.
Signed-off-by: Yifan Hong <elsk@google.com>
---
scripts/kconfig/symbol.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c b/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c
index 8df0a75f40b9..72ab4f274289 100644
--- a/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c
+++ b/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c
@@ -1045,6 +1045,8 @@ static void sym_check_print_recursive(struct symbol *last_sym)
struct menu *menu = NULL;
struct property *prop;
struct dep_stack cv_stack;
+ const char *filename = NULL;
+ int lineno = 0;
if (sym_is_choice_value(last_sym)) {
dep_stack_insert(&cv_stack, last_sym);
@@ -1060,6 +1062,10 @@ static void sym_check_print_recursive(struct symbol *last_sym)
}
for (; stack; stack = stack->next) {
+ filename = "???";
+ lineno = 0;
+ menu = NULL;
+
sym = stack->sym;
next_sym = stack->next ? stack->next->sym : last_sym;
prop = stack->prop;
@@ -1073,45 +1079,52 @@ static void sym_check_print_recursive(struct symbol *last_sym)
if (prop->menu)
break;
}
+ if (menu) {
+ filename = menu->filename;
+ lineno = menu->lineno;
+ }
+ } else if (prop) {
+ filename = prop->filename;
+ lineno = prop->lineno;
}
if (stack->sym == last_sym)
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:error: recursive dependency detected!\n",
- prop->filename, prop->lineno);
+ filename, lineno);
if (sym_is_choice(sym)) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tchoice %s contains symbol %s\n",
- menu->filename, menu->lineno,
+ filename, lineno,
sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
} else if (sym_is_choice_value(sym)) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s is part of choice %s\n",
- menu->filename, menu->lineno,
+ filename, lineno,
sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
} else if (stack->expr == &sym->dir_dep.expr) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s depends on %s\n",
- prop->filename, prop->lineno,
+ filename, lineno,
sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
} else if (stack->expr == &sym->rev_dep.expr) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s is selected by %s\n",
- prop->filename, prop->lineno,
+ filename, lineno,
sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
} else if (stack->expr == &sym->implied.expr) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s is implied by %s\n",
- prop->filename, prop->lineno,
+ filename, lineno,
sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
} else if (stack->expr) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s %s value contains %s\n",
- prop->filename, prop->lineno,
+ filename, lineno,
sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
prop_get_type_name(prop->type),
next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
} else {
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:\tsymbol %s %s is visible depending on %s\n",
- prop->filename, prop->lineno,
+ filename, lineno,
sym->name ? sym->name : "<choice>",
prop_get_type_name(prop->type),
next_sym->name ? next_sym->name : "<choice>");
--
2.45.2.627.g7a2c4fd464-goog
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-18 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-18 18:56 Yifan Hong [this message]
2024-06-19 1:36 ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-06-20 19:46 ` Yifan Hong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240618185609.4096399-1-elsk@google.com \
--to=elsk@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®