From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
Cc: <alexandre.ferrieux@orange.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<dccp@vger.kernel.org>, <dsahern@kernel.org>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <fw@strlen.de>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<kuniyu@amazon.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] Fix race for duplicate reqsk on identical SYN
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:53:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240619195313.9962-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1e13509-9544-0fa5-4cb4-520c068bde6a@kylinos.cn>
From: luoxuanqiang <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:54:15 +0800
> 在 2024/6/18 01:59, Kuniyuki Iwashima 写道:
> > From: luoxuanqiang <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
> > Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:56:40 +0800
> >> When bonding is configured in BOND_MODE_BROADCAST mode, if two identical
> >> SYN packets are received at the same time and processed on different CPUs,
> >> it can potentially create the same sk (sock) but two different reqsk
> >> (request_sock) in tcp_conn_request().
> >>
> >> These two different reqsk will respond with two SYNACK packets, and since
> >> the generation of the seq (ISN) incorporates a timestamp, the final two
> >> SYNACK packets will have different seq values.
> >>
> >> The consequence is that when the Client receives and replies with an ACK
> >> to the earlier SYNACK packet, we will reset(RST) it.
> >>
> >> ========================================================================
> >>
> >> This behavior is consistently reproducible in my local setup,
> >> which comprises:
> >>
> >> | NETA1 ------ NETB1 |
> >> PC_A --- bond --- | | --- bond --- PC_B
> >> | NETA2 ------ NETB2 |
> >>
> >> - PC_A is the Server and has two network cards, NETA1 and NETA2. I have
> >> bonded these two cards using BOND_MODE_BROADCAST mode and configured
> >> them to be handled by different CPU.
> >>
> >> - PC_B is the Client, also equipped with two network cards, NETB1 and
> >> NETB2, which are also bonded and configured in BOND_MODE_BROADCAST mode.
> >>
> >> If the client attempts a TCP connection to the server, it might encounter
> >> a failure. Capturing packets from the server side reveals:
> >>
> >> 10.10.10.10.45182 > localhost: Flags [S], seq 320236027,
> >> 10.10.10.10.45182 > localhost: Flags [S], seq 320236027,
> >> localhost > 10.10.10.10.45182: Flags [S.], seq 2967855116,
> >> localhost > 10.10.10.10.45182: Flags [S.], seq 2967855123, <==
> >> 10.10.10.10.45182 > localhost: Flags [.], ack 4294967290,
> >> 10.10.10.10.45182 > localhost: Flags [.], ack 4294967290,
> >> localhost > 10.10.10.10.45182: Flags [R], seq 2967855117, <==
> >> localhost > 10.10.10.10.45182: Flags [R], seq 2967855117,
> >>
> >> Two SYNACKs with different seq numbers are sent by localhost,
> >> resulting in an anomaly.
> >>
> >> ========================================================================
> >>
> >> The attempted solution is as follows:
> >> In the tcp_conn_request(), while inserting reqsk into the ehash table,
> >> it also checks if an entry already exists. If found, it avoids
> >> reinsertion and releases it.
> >>
> >> Simultaneously, In the reqsk_queue_hash_req(), the start of the
> >> req->rsk_timer is adjusted to be after successful insertion.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: luoxuanqiang <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
> >> ---
> >> include/net/inet_connection_sock.h | 4 ++--
> >> net/dccp/ipv4.c | 2 +-
> >> net/dccp/ipv6.c | 2 +-
> >> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> >> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >> 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> >> index 7d6b1254c92d..8ebab6220dbc 100644
> >> --- a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> >> +++ b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> >> @@ -263,8 +263,8 @@ struct dst_entry *inet_csk_route_child_sock(const struct sock *sk,
> >> struct sock *inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add(struct sock *sk,
> >> struct request_sock *req,
> >> struct sock *child);
> >> -void inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> >> - unsigned long timeout);
> >> +bool inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> >> + unsigned long timeout, bool *found_dup_sk);
> >> struct sock *inet_csk_complete_hashdance(struct sock *sk, struct sock *child,
> >> struct request_sock *req,
> >> bool own_req);
> >> diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> >> index ff41bd6f99c3..13aafdeb9205 100644
> >> --- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> >> +++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> >> @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ int dccp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> if (dccp_v4_send_response(sk, req))
> >> goto drop_and_free;
> >>
> >> - inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
> >> + inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT, NULL);
> >> reqsk_put(req);
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> >> index 85f4b8fdbe5e..493cdb12ce2b 100644
> >> --- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> >> +++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> >> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> if (dccp_v6_send_response(sk, req))
> >> goto drop_and_free;
> >>
> >> - inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
> >> + inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT, NULL);
> >> reqsk_put(req);
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> >> index d81f74ce0f02..2fa9b33ae26a 100644
> >> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> >> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> >> @@ -1122,25 +1122,32 @@ static void reqsk_timer_handler(struct timer_list *t)
> >> inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop_and_put(oreq->rsk_listener, oreq);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static void reqsk_queue_hash_req(struct request_sock *req,
> >> - unsigned long timeout)
> >> +static bool reqsk_queue_hash_req(struct request_sock *req,
> >> + unsigned long timeout, bool *found_dup_sk)
> >> {
> > Given any changes here in reqsk_queue_hash_req() conflicts with 4.19
> > (oldest stable) and DCCP does not check found_dup_sk, you can define
> > found_dup_sk here, then you need not touch DCCP at all.
>
> Apologies for not fully understanding your advice. If we cannot modify
> the content of reqsk_queue_hash_req() and should avoid touching the DCCP
> part, it seems the issue requires reworking some interfaces. Specifically:
>
> The call flow to add reqsk to ehash is as follows:
>
> tcp_conn_request()
>
> dccp_v4(6)_conn_request()
>
> -> inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add()
>
> -> reqsk_queue_hash_req()
>
> -> inet_ehash_insert()
>
> tcp_conn_request() needs to call the same interface inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add()
> as dccp_v4(6)_conn_request(), but the critical section for installation check and
> insertion into ehash is within inet_ehash_insert().
> If reqsk_queue_hash_req() should not be modified, then we need to rewrite
> the interfaces to distinguish them. I don't see how redefining found_dup_sk
> alone can resolve this conflict point.
I just said we cannot avoid conflict so suggested avoiding found_dup_sk
in inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add().
But I finally ended up modifying DCCP because we return before setting
refcnt.
---8<---
diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
index ff41bd6f99c3..b2a8aed35eb0 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
@@ -657,8 +657,11 @@ int dccp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (dccp_v4_send_response(sk, req))
goto drop_and_free;
- inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
- reqsk_put(req);
+ if (unlikely(inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT)))
+ reqsk_free(req);
+ else
+ reqsk_put(req);
+
return 0;
drop_and_free:
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index d81f74ce0f02..7dd6892b10b9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -1122,25 +1122,33 @@ static void reqsk_timer_handler(struct timer_list *t)
inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop_and_put(oreq->rsk_listener, oreq);
}
-static void reqsk_queue_hash_req(struct request_sock *req,
+static bool reqsk_queue_hash_req(struct request_sock *req,
unsigned long timeout)
{
+ bool found_dup_sk;
+
+ if (!inet_ehash_insert(req_to_sk(req), NULL, &found_dup_sk))
+ return false;
+
timer_setup(&req->rsk_timer, reqsk_timer_handler, TIMER_PINNED);
mod_timer(&req->rsk_timer, jiffies + timeout);
- inet_ehash_insert(req_to_sk(req), NULL, NULL);
/* before letting lookups find us, make sure all req fields
* are committed to memory and refcnt initialized.
*/
smp_wmb();
refcount_set(&req->rsk_refcnt, 2 + 1);
+ return true;
}
-void inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
+bool inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
unsigned long timeout)
{
- reqsk_queue_hash_req(req, timeout);
+ if (!reqsk_queue_hash_req(req, timeout))
+ return false;
+
inet_csk_reqsk_queue_added(sk);
+ return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add);
---8<---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-17 7:56 luoxuanqiang
2024-06-17 11:31 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-17 17:59 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-19 6:54 ` luoxuanqiang
2024-06-19 19:53 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2024-06-20 2:38 ` luoxuanqiang
2024-06-20 19:14 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-21 1:36 ` luoxuanqiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240619195313.9962-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=alexandre.ferrieux@orange.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®