From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Reap workers via kthread_stop() and remove detach_completion
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:32:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240621073225.3600-2-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240621073225.3600-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
The code to kick off the destruction of workers is now in a process
context (idle_cull_fn()), so kthread_stop() can be used in the process
context to replace the work of pool->detach_completion.
The wakeup in wake_dying_workers() is unneeded after this change, but it
is harmless, jut keep it here until next patch renames wake_dying_workers()
rather than renaming it again and again.
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 25a7d9a1a7ae..a0fb2f60e938 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -216,7 +216,6 @@ struct worker_pool {
struct worker *manager; /* L: purely informational */
struct list_head workers; /* A: attached workers */
struct list_head dying_workers; /* A: workers about to die */
- struct completion *detach_completion; /* all workers detached */
struct ida worker_ida; /* worker IDs for task name */
@@ -2696,7 +2695,6 @@ static void worker_attach_to_pool(struct worker *worker,
static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker *worker)
{
struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
- struct completion *detach_completion = NULL;
/* there is one permanent BH worker per CPU which should never detach */
WARN_ON_ONCE(pool->flags & POOL_BH);
@@ -2707,15 +2705,10 @@ static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker *worker)
list_del(&worker->node);
worker->pool = NULL;
- if (list_empty(&pool->workers) && list_empty(&pool->dying_workers))
- detach_completion = pool->detach_completion;
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
/* clear leftover flags without pool->lock after it is detached */
worker->flags &= ~(WORKER_UNBOUND | WORKER_REBOUND);
-
- if (detach_completion)
- complete(detach_completion);
}
/**
@@ -2816,10 +2809,9 @@ static void unbind_worker(struct worker *worker)
static void wake_dying_workers(struct list_head *cull_list)
{
- struct worker *worker, *tmp;
+ struct worker *worker;
- list_for_each_entry_safe(worker, tmp, cull_list, entry) {
- list_del_init(&worker->entry);
+ list_for_each_entry(worker, cull_list, entry) {
unbind_worker(worker);
/*
* If the worker was somehow already running, then it had to be
@@ -2835,6 +2827,17 @@ static void wake_dying_workers(struct list_head *cull_list)
}
}
+static void reap_dying_workers(struct list_head *cull_list)
+{
+ struct worker *worker, *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(worker, tmp, cull_list, entry) {
+ list_del_init(&worker->entry);
+ kthread_stop_put(worker->task);
+ kfree(worker);
+ }
+}
+
/**
* set_worker_dying - Tag a worker for destruction
* @worker: worker to be destroyed
@@ -2866,6 +2869,9 @@ static void set_worker_dying(struct worker *worker, struct list_head *list)
list_move(&worker->entry, list);
list_move(&worker->node, &pool->dying_workers);
+
+ /* get an extra task struct reference for later kthread_stop_put() */
+ get_task_struct(worker->task);
}
/**
@@ -2949,6 +2955,8 @@ static void idle_cull_fn(struct work_struct *work)
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
wake_dying_workers(&cull_list);
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
+
+ reap_dying_workers(&cull_list);
}
static void send_mayday(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -3330,7 +3338,6 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__worker)
ida_free(&pool->worker_ida, worker->id);
worker_detach_from_pool(worker);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&worker->entry));
- kfree(worker);
return 0;
}
@@ -4863,7 +4870,6 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu)
*/
static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
{
- DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(detach_completion);
struct worker *worker;
LIST_HEAD(cull_list);
@@ -4917,12 +4923,9 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
wake_dying_workers(&cull_list);
- if (!list_empty(&pool->workers) || !list_empty(&pool->dying_workers))
- pool->detach_completion = &detach_completion;
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
- if (pool->detach_completion)
- wait_for_completion(pool->detach_completion);
+ reap_dying_workers(&cull_list);
/* shut down the timers */
del_timer_sync(&pool->idle_timer);
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-21 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-21 7:32 [PATCH 0/4] workqueue: Destroy workers in idle_cull_fn() Lai Jiangshan
2024-06-21 7:32 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2024-07-23 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Reap workers via kthread_stop() and remove detach_completion Marc Hartmayer
2024-07-25 0:11 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-07-29 1:49 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-09-10 9:45 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-09-10 16:29 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-09-11 3:23 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-09-11 3:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-09-11 8:27 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-09-11 9:37 ` Marc Hartmayer
2024-06-21 7:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: Don't bind the rescuer in the last working cpu Lai Jiangshan
2024-06-21 7:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] workqueue: Detach workers directly in idle_cull_fn() Lai Jiangshan
2024-06-21 7:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: Remove useless pool->dying_workers Lai Jiangshan
2024-06-21 22:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] workqueue: Destroy workers in idle_cull_fn() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240621073225.3600-2-jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--to=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®