From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2422125779; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720095553; cv=none; b=WWbg8P5I+a5AFJNLlp39RzYhsPJdpVSFY/p6uqvsr6/EzLGsDRlvJn9tgmn9J2jl93jcknvRvCEHezJ4DBFpHcgyLVEM/hGMYC+oNS/mffXaJkG0TcJr2xtQuKK6HYdYMAen/93pQL/U8wzqbMm6dsXjk0zBp89F1Eobxd4t9qI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720095553; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Nnlx2nHqz0VPl3CWDgzgXFLf1nEKUzyfRv56y/zLLtk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WVugdObJ0oJ7hePlLpFnHhrrdN/uXPPBCggYD3sknKQxt6ee/uGrG2UyDMAQfHPNRzBpkEQOdihPAcDDnWEJiSXgtTCMJjoeamm6DXuc5+ljFzxktehFk72w4l+WQ9AsCglQtP5pi4kxcJuTx5k4stATvcoIwKeJlzFWPdz3zpM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=zibf5UeN; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=FC/+YWlj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="zibf5UeN"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="FC/+YWlj" Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:19:08 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1720095550; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bAv0pawrlTY1HxGYFhyoC+vPlRm/ofgkenUj6RqKG+8=; b=zibf5UeNO2SvoaMy/Fmrk4rG1LXq+drMULDUKoNV6B+MZA48UpRCtUHeIQn/ldsIIuSzRw cZ01KjDKWumFaAUsS6sX66QtiHZz5kv7CuEdVTKT50Wr/9rf4opT7YxX7Qj2Zm35BgXb2m RK3lVo7CIwuWojjs2FnKAkl7HyAVeDfQUYtoC0hDUXOrob/zcSlVOKRHv8GApU/vQkXfac 4Vk7n7TeEO7PoCDeWFcF59q0ySjvPkd3IbL0RkkCcpVcwPTABI16F1VQeE0jZjsxE4bJw9 +eDizpmcHjC1bpBnw4+U3DVsh9d1nhbDp14mu2bOnwwZ6DRJOB9c91LXpMsH9Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1720095550; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bAv0pawrlTY1HxGYFhyoC+vPlRm/ofgkenUj6RqKG+8=; b=FC/+YWljnqh8L9IpnFdXPnrZooaGcGd0M3aqtJvVZcnn5x4cuq2m5MiBfXOp16JkGNWTwj 2M1MLhCUOSF5V0Cg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Minchan Kim , Sergey Senozhatsky , Jens Axboe , Thomas Gleixner , Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t. Message-ID: <20240704121908.GjH4p40u@linutronix.de> References: <20240620153556.777272-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20240620153556.777272-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <27fb4f62-d656-449c-9f3c-5d0b61a88cca@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27fb4f62-d656-449c-9f3c-5d0b61a88cca@intel.com> On 2024-07-04 13:38:04 [+0200], Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > index 3acd7006ad2cc..036845cd4f25e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > > @@ -57,19 +57,34 @@ static void zram_free_page(struct zram *zram, size_t index); > > static int zram_read_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index, > > struct bio *parent); > > > > +static void zram_meta_init_table_locks(struct zram *zram, size_t num_pages) > > +{ > > + size_t index; > > + > > + for (index = 0; index < num_pages; index++) > > Maybe declare @index right here? But why? Declarations at the top followed by code. > > > + spin_lock_init(&zram->table[index].lock); > > +} > > [...] > > Thanks, > Olek Sebastian