From: tuhaowen <tuhaowen@uniontech.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com, huangbibo@uniontech.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
tuhaowen@uniontech.com, wangyuli@uniontech.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] dev/parport: fix the array out-of-bounds risk
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 14:36:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240705063658.8782-1-tuhaowen@uniontech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024070413-obsessive-stack-7c62@gregkh>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 06:07:47PM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Usually because no one actually has this hardware anymore :)
>
> Can you also properly test the buffer size when writing into it so that
> even if the math is incorrect, it will not overflow?
As of now, I have encountered these three devices: BUNET BU1L02,
EB-LINK EB-2C1B01, and SYBA FG-EMT03A-N. When these PCIe to parallel
port cards are installed, the system experiences abnormal reboots.
I am not sure if there are other devices with these issues.
Below is the stack trace I encountered during the actual issue:
[ 66.575408s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,4]Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector:
Kernel stack is corrupted in: do_hardware_base_addr+0xcc/0xd0 [parport]
[ 66.575408s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,5]CPU: 4 PID: 5118 Comm:
QThread Tainted: G S W O 5.10.97-arm64-desktop #7100.57021.2
[ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,6]TGID: 5087 Comm: EFileApp
[ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,7]Hardware name: HUAWEI HUAWEI QingYun
PGUX-W515x-B081/SP1PANGUXM, BIOS 1.00.07 04/29/2024
[ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,8]Call trace:
[ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,9] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0
[ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,0] show_stack+0x14/0x20
[ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,1] dump_stack+0xd4/0x10c
[ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,2] panic+0x1d8/0x3bc
[ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,3] __stack_chk_fail+0x2c/0x38
[ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,4] do_hardware_base_addr+0xcc/0xd0 [parport]
The array buffer size is 20 bytes.
When executing code in a 64-bit CPU environment,
up to 44 bytes of data will be written into this array
(the size of "%lu\t%lu\n" is 21 + 1 + 21 + 1).
This modification will resolve the current issue without introducing new problems.
Thanks,
Haowen.Tu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-05 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-26 2:11 tuhaowen
2024-07-04 10:07 ` Greg KH
2024-07-05 6:36 ` tuhaowen [this message]
2024-07-05 6:45 ` Greg KH
2024-07-05 8:58 ` tuhaowen
2024-07-05 9:42 ` Greg KH
2024-07-08 2:33 ` tuhaowen
2024-07-08 7:18 ` Greg KH
2024-07-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v2] " tuhaowen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240705063658.8782-1-tuhaowen@uniontech.com \
--to=tuhaowen@uniontech.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=huangbibo@uniontech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=wangyuli@uniontech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®