From: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
To: jmaloy@redhat.com, ying.xue@windriver.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tipc: Consolidate redundant functions
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 23:36:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240709143632.352656-1-syoshida@redhat.com> (raw)
link_is_up() and tipc_link_is_up() have the same functionality.
Consolidate these functions.
Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
---
net/tipc/link.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index 0716eb5c8a31..5c2088a469ce 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -241,13 +241,6 @@ enum {
LINK_SYNCHING = 0xc << 24
};
-/* Link FSM state checking routines
- */
-static int link_is_up(struct tipc_link *l)
-{
- return l->state & (LINK_ESTABLISHED | LINK_SYNCHING);
-}
-
static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct sk_buff_head *xmitq);
static void tipc_link_build_proto_msg(struct tipc_link *l, int mtyp, bool probe,
@@ -274,7 +267,7 @@ static void tipc_link_update_cwin(struct tipc_link *l, int released,
*/
bool tipc_link_is_up(struct tipc_link *l)
{
- return link_is_up(l);
+ return l->state & (LINK_ESTABLISHED | LINK_SYNCHING);
}
bool tipc_link_peer_is_down(struct tipc_link *l)
@@ -1790,7 +1783,7 @@ int tipc_link_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
rcv_nxt = l->rcv_nxt;
win_lim = rcv_nxt + TIPC_MAX_LINK_WIN;
- if (unlikely(!link_is_up(l))) {
+ if (unlikely(!tipc_link_is_up(l))) {
if (l->state == LINK_ESTABLISHING)
rc = TIPC_LINK_UP_EVT;
kfree_skb(skb);
@@ -1848,7 +1841,7 @@ static void tipc_link_build_proto_msg(struct tipc_link *l, int mtyp, bool probe,
struct tipc_link *bcl = l->bc_rcvlink;
struct tipc_msg *hdr;
struct sk_buff *skb;
- bool node_up = link_is_up(bcl);
+ bool node_up = tipc_link_is_up(bcl);
u16 glen = 0, bc_rcvgap = 0;
int dlen = 0;
void *data;
@@ -2163,7 +2156,7 @@ bool tipc_link_validate_msg(struct tipc_link *l, struct tipc_msg *hdr)
if (session != curr_session)
return false;
/* Extra sanity check */
- if (!link_is_up(l) && msg_ack(hdr))
+ if (!tipc_link_is_up(l) && msg_ack(hdr))
return false;
if (!(l->peer_caps & TIPC_LINK_PROTO_SEQNO))
return true;
@@ -2261,7 +2254,7 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
}
/* ACTIVATE_MSG serves as PEER_RESET if link is already down */
- if (mtyp == RESET_MSG || !link_is_up(l))
+ if (mtyp == RESET_MSG || !tipc_link_is_up(l))
rc = tipc_link_fsm_evt(l, LINK_PEER_RESET_EVT);
/* ACTIVATE_MSG takes up link if it was already locally reset */
@@ -2300,7 +2293,7 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (msg_probe(hdr))
l->stats.recv_probes++;
- if (!link_is_up(l)) {
+ if (!tipc_link_is_up(l)) {
if (l->state == LINK_ESTABLISHING)
rc = TIPC_LINK_UP_EVT;
break;
@@ -2387,7 +2380,7 @@ void tipc_link_bc_init_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct tipc_msg *hdr)
int mtyp = msg_type(hdr);
u16 peers_snd_nxt = msg_bc_snd_nxt(hdr);
- if (link_is_up(l))
+ if (tipc_link_is_up(l))
return;
if (msg_user(hdr) == BCAST_PROTOCOL) {
@@ -2415,7 +2408,7 @@ int tipc_link_bc_sync_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct tipc_msg *hdr,
u16 peers_snd_nxt = msg_bc_snd_nxt(hdr);
int rc = 0;
- if (!link_is_up(l))
+ if (!tipc_link_is_up(l))
return rc;
if (!msg_peer_node_is_up(hdr))
@@ -2475,7 +2468,7 @@ int tipc_link_bc_ack_rcv(struct tipc_link *r, u16 acked, u16 gap,
bool unused = false;
int rc = 0;
- if (!link_is_up(r) || !r->bc_peer_is_up)
+ if (!tipc_link_is_up(r) || !r->bc_peer_is_up)
return 0;
if (gap) {
@@ -2873,7 +2866,7 @@ void tipc_link_set_tolerance(struct tipc_link *l, u32 tol,
l->tolerance = tol;
if (l->bc_rcvlink)
l->bc_rcvlink->tolerance = tol;
- if (link_is_up(l))
+ if (tipc_link_is_up(l))
tipc_link_build_proto_msg(l, STATE_MSG, 0, 0, 0, tol, 0, xmitq);
}
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-09 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-09 14:36 Shigeru Yoshida [this message]
2024-07-10 5:18 ` Tung Nguyen
2024-07-12 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240709143632.352656-1-syoshida@redhat.com \
--to=syoshida@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®