From: neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
leobras@redhat.com, imran.f.khan@oracle.com, riel@surriel.com,
neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] locking/csd_lock: Print large numbers as negatives
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:07:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240722133735.667161-1-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240722133559.GA667117@neeraj.linux>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
The CSD-lock-hold diagnostics from CONFIG_CSD_LOCK_WAIT_DEBUG are
printed in nanoseconds as unsigned long longs, which is a bit obtuse for
human readers when timing bugs result in negative CSD-lock hold times.
Yes, there are some people to whom it is immediately obvious that
18446744073709551615 is really -1, but for the rest of us...
Therefore, print these numbers as signed long longs, making the negative
hold times immediately apparent.
Reported-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
---
kernel/smp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index f085ebcdf9e7..81f7083a53e2 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -248,8 +248,8 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
cpu_cur_csd = smp_load_acquire(&per_cpu(cur_csd, cpux)); /* Before func and info. */
/* How long since this CSD lock was stuck. */
ts_delta = ts2 - ts0;
- pr_alert("csd: %s non-responsive CSD lock (#%d) on CPU#%d, waiting %llu ns for CPU#%02d %pS(%ps).\n",
- firsttime ? "Detected" : "Continued", *bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), ts_delta,
+ pr_alert("csd: %s non-responsive CSD lock (#%d) on CPU#%d, waiting %lld ns for CPU#%02d %pS(%ps).\n",
+ firsttime ? "Detected" : "Continued", *bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), (s64)ts_delta,
cpu, csd->func, csd->info);
/*
* If the CSD lock is still stuck after 5 minutes, it is unlikely
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-22 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-22 13:35 [PATCH v2 0/3] CSD-lock diagnostics enhancements Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-07-22 13:37 ` neeraj.upadhyay [this message]
2024-07-22 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] locking/csd_lock: Provide an indication of ongoing CSD-lock stall neeraj.upadhyay
2024-07-31 21:35 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-07-31 22:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-08-05 21:42 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-07-22 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] locking/csd-lock: Use backoff for repeated reports of same incident neeraj.upadhyay
2024-07-31 22:01 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-07-24 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/3] smp: print only local CPU info when sched_clock goes backward neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-06 6:09 ` Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240722133735.667161-1-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--to=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®