mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,  "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
	 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	 Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	 Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  eranian@google.com,
	irogers@google.com, namhyung@google.com
Subject: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Fix arch_mbm_* array overrun on SNC
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 13:46:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240722204611.3549213-1-peternewman@google.com> (raw)

When using resctrl on systems with Sub-NUMA Clustering enabled,
monitoring groups may be allocated RMID values which would overrun the
arch_mbm_{local,total} arrays.

This is due to inconsistencies in whether the SNC-adjusted num_rmid
value or the unadjusted value in resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx() is
used. The num_rmid value for the L3 resource is currently:

 resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx() / snc_nodes_per_l3_cache

As a simple fix, make resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx() return the
SNC-adjusted, L3 num_rmid value on x86.

Fixes: e13db55b5a0d ("x86/resctrl: Introduce snc_nodes_per_l3_cache")
Signed-off-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h     | 6 ------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 8 ++++++++
 include/linux/resctrl.h            | 3 +++
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
index 12dbd2588ca7..8b1b6ce1e51b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
@@ -156,12 +156,6 @@ static inline void resctrl_sched_in(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		__resctrl_sched_in(tsk);
 }
 
-static inline u32 resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(void)
-{
-	/* RMID are independent numbers for x86. num_rmid_idx == num_rmid */
-	return boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_max_rmid + 1;
-}
-
 static inline void resctrl_arch_rmid_idx_decode(u32 idx, u32 *closid, u32 *rmid)
 {
 	*rmid = idx;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
index 1930fce9dfe9..8591d53c144b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
@@ -119,6 +119,14 @@ struct rdt_hw_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
 	},
 };
 
+u32 resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(void)
+{
+	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
+
+	/* RMID are independent numbers for x86. num_rmid_idx == num_rmid */
+	return r->num_rmid;
+}
+
 /*
  * cache_alloc_hsw_probe() - Have to probe for Intel haswell server CPUs
  * as they do not have CPUID enumeration support for Cache allocation.
diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
index b0875b99e811..43ac241471b3 100644
--- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
+++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
@@ -248,6 +248,9 @@ struct resctrl_schema {
 
 /* The number of closid supported by this resource regardless of CDP */
 u32 resctrl_arch_get_num_closid(struct rdt_resource *r);
+
+u32 resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(void);
+
 int resctrl_arch_update_domains(struct rdt_resource *r, u32 closid);
 
 /*
-- 
2.45.2.1089.g2a221341d9-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2024-07-22 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-22 20:46 Peter Newman [this message]
2024-08-01 18:16 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-08-22 16:33   ` Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240722204611.3549213-1-peternewman@google.com \
    --to=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@google.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®