From: Yang Yang <yang.yang@vivo.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yang Yang <yang.yang@vivo.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] block: fix deadlock between sd_remove & sd_release
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:04:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240724070412.22521-1-yang.yang@vivo.com> (raw)
Our test report the following hung task:
[ 2538.459400] INFO: task "kworker/0:0":7 blocked for more than 188 seconds.
[ 2538.459427] Call trace:
[ 2538.459430] __switch_to+0x174/0x338
[ 2538.459436] __schedule+0x628/0x9c4
[ 2538.459442] schedule+0x7c/0xe8
[ 2538.459447] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40
[ 2538.459453] __mutex_lock+0x3ec/0xf04
[ 2538.459456] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14/0x24
[ 2538.459459] mutex_lock+0x30/0xd8
[ 2538.459462] del_gendisk+0xdc/0x350
[ 2538.459466] sd_remove+0x30/0x60
[ 2538.459470] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c4/0x2c4
[ 2538.459474] device_release_driver+0x18/0x28
[ 2538.459478] bus_remove_device+0x15c/0x174
[ 2538.459483] device_del+0x1d0/0x358
[ 2538.459488] __scsi_remove_device+0xa8/0x198
[ 2538.459493] scsi_forget_host+0x50/0x70
[ 2538.459497] scsi_remove_host+0x80/0x180
[ 2538.459502] usb_stor_disconnect+0x68/0xf4
[ 2538.459506] usb_unbind_interface+0xd4/0x280
[ 2538.459510] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c4/0x2c4
[ 2538.459514] device_release_driver+0x18/0x28
[ 2538.459518] bus_remove_device+0x15c/0x174
[ 2538.459523] device_del+0x1d0/0x358
[ 2538.459528] usb_disable_device+0x84/0x194
[ 2538.459532] usb_disconnect+0xec/0x300
[ 2538.459537] hub_event+0xb80/0x1870
[ 2538.459541] process_scheduled_works+0x248/0x4dc
[ 2538.459545] worker_thread+0x244/0x334
[ 2538.459549] kthread+0x114/0x1bc
[ 2538.461001] INFO: task "fsck.":15415 blocked for more than 188 seconds.
[ 2538.461014] Call trace:
[ 2538.461016] __switch_to+0x174/0x338
[ 2538.461021] __schedule+0x628/0x9c4
[ 2538.461025] schedule+0x7c/0xe8
[ 2538.461030] blk_queue_enter+0xc4/0x160
[ 2538.461034] blk_mq_alloc_request+0x120/0x1d4
[ 2538.461037] scsi_execute_cmd+0x7c/0x23c
[ 2538.461040] ioctl_internal_command+0x5c/0x164
[ 2538.461046] scsi_set_medium_removal+0x5c/0xb0
[ 2538.461051] sd_release+0x50/0x94
[ 2538.461054] blkdev_put+0x190/0x28c
[ 2538.461058] blkdev_release+0x28/0x40
[ 2538.461063] __fput+0xf8/0x2a8
[ 2538.461066] __fput_sync+0x28/0x5c
[ 2538.461070] __arm64_sys_close+0x84/0xe8
[ 2538.461073] invoke_syscall+0x58/0x114
[ 2538.461078] el0_svc_common+0xac/0xe0
[ 2538.461082] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
[ 2538.461087] el0_svc+0x38/0x68
[ 2538.461090] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x68/0xbc
[ 2538.461093] el0t_64_sync+0x1a8/0x1ac
T1: T2:
sd_remove
del_gendisk
__blk_mark_disk_dead
blk_freeze_queue_start
++q->mq_freeze_depth
bdev_release
mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex)
sd_release
scsi_execute_cmd
blk_queue_enter
wait_event(!q->mq_freeze_depth)
mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex)
SCSI does not set GD_OWNS_QUEUE, so QUEUE_FLAG_DYING is not set in
this scenario. This is a classic ABBA deadlock. To fix the deadlock,
make sure we don't try to acquire disk->open_mutex after freezing
the queue.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: eec1be4c30df ("block: delete partitions later in del_gendisk")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
Changes from v2:
- Add Fixes: and Cc: stable by suggestion
Changes from v1:
- Modify commit message by suggestion
---
block/genhd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index 8f1f3c6b4d67..c5fca3e893a0 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -663,12 +663,12 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
*/
if (!test_bit(GD_DEAD, &disk->state))
blk_report_disk_dead(disk, false);
- __blk_mark_disk_dead(disk);
/*
* Drop all partitions now that the disk is marked dead.
*/
mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex);
+ __blk_mark_disk_dead(disk);
xa_for_each_start(&disk->part_tbl, idx, part, 1)
drop_partition(part);
mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-24 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-24 7:04 Yang Yang [this message]
2024-07-24 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-24 15:52 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240724070412.22521-1-yang.yang@vivo.com \
--to=yang.yang@vivo.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®