From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
brauner@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
willy@infradead.org, clm@fb.com, riel@surriel.com,
ffledgling@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC exit] Sleep at TASK_IDLE when waiting for application core dump
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:29:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240725132849.GA6602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1936bd18-775b-43e3-bfd5-2cd343565f06@paulmck-laptop>
On 07/24, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Currently, the coredump_task_exit() function sets the task state to
> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_FREEZABLE, which usually works well. But a
> combination of large memory and slow (and/or highly contended) mass
> storage can cause application core dumps to take more than two minutes,
> which can triggers "task blocked" splats.
Do you mean check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks() ?
In any case,
> Therefore, change that TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE to TASK_IDLE.
...
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void coredump_task_exit(struct task_struct *tsk)
> complete(&core_state->startup);
>
> for (;;) {
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_FREEZABLE);
> + set_current_state(TASK_IDLE|TASK_FREEZABLE);
To me this change makes sense regardless...
To some degree TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE is misleading, in that the task which
sleeps in coredump_task_exit() is _KILLABLE, although not "directly".
A SIGKILL sent to the coredumping process will interrupt the coredumping thread
(see the signal->core_state check in prepare_signal() and fatal_signal_pending()
check in dump_interrupted()) and then this thread will wakeup the threads sleeping
in coredump_task_exit(), see coredump_finish().
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-25 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-25 0:04 Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-25 13:29 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-07-25 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-25 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240725132849.GA6602@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=ffledgling@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®