From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: 胡连勤 <hulianqin@vivo.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"opensource.kernel" <opensource.kernel@vivo.com>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH] usb: gadget:Fixed the problem of abnormal function of mobile phone as UVC camera.
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 09:05:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024072537-landowner-diaphragm-1d22@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYUPR06MB621753631B9F7836583E7BEED2AB2@TYUPR06MB6217.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 06:40:14AM +0000, 胡连勤 wrote:
> From b0058484e3fe7830c2092d5d19b46bf1bab73d83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Lianqin Hu <hulianqin@vivo.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 18:52:27 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] usb: gadget:Fixed the problem of abnormal function of mobile
> phone as UVC camera.
For some reason this showed up in the body of the email, and your
subject line has "subject" in it :(
> Android 15 USB function option interface adds camera function.
> after switching to camera function, USB enumeration is abnormal.
What do you mean by "abnormal"?
> the reason is that bind_deactivated is set to true in f_uvc driver,
> which causes gadget->deactivated to be set to true during
> usb_add_function,and dwc3 controller cannot perform pullup operation.
Why does the dwc3 controller matter here? What about other controllers?
>
> Therefore, modify f_uvc driver and remove the setting operation
> of func.bind_deactivated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lianqin Hu <hulianqin@vivo.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c
> index 40187b7112e7..6d63bea14211 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c
> @@ -1107,7 +1107,6 @@ static struct usb_function *uvc_alloc(struct usb_function_instance *fi)
> uvc->func.disable = uvc_function_disable;
> uvc->func.setup = uvc_function_setup;
> uvc->func.free_func = uvc_free;
> - uvc->func.bind_deactivated = true;
Why was this set to be true to start with? What commit id does this
fix? Should it be backported to older kernels, and if so, how far back?
What user-visable changes does this patch cause? What used to work that
now will not as that was added for a reason, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-25 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-25 6:40 胡连勤
2024-07-25 7:05 ` gregkh [this message]
2024-07-26 1:49 ` 回复: " 胡连勤
[not found] ` <TYUPR06MB621755F6FD643E99DBD21D42D2B02@TYUPR06MB6217.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
2024-07-30 13:16 ` gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024072537-landowner-diaphragm-1d22@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hulianqin@vivo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opensource.kernel@vivo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®