mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca, amritha.nambiar@intel.com,
	sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
	Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [RFC net-next 2/5] net: Suspend softirq when prefer_busy_poll is set
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:57:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240812125717.413108-3-jdamato@fastly.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812125717.413108-1-jdamato@fastly.com>

From: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>

When NAPI_F_PREFER_BUSY_POLL is set during busy_poll_stop and the
irq_suspend_timeout sysfs is nonzero, this timeout is used to defer
softirq scheduling, potentially longer than gro_flush_timeout. This can
be used to effectively suspend softirq processing during the time it
takes for an application to process data and return to the next
busy-poll.

The call to napi->poll in busy_poll_stop might lead to an invocation of
napi_complete_done, but the prefer-busy flag is still set at that time,
so the same logic is used to defer softirq scheduling for
irq_suspend_timeout.

Signed-off-by: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>
Co-developed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Tested-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Tested-by: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index bf45c90aebcd..a19470253eb4 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6214,7 +6214,6 @@ bool napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done)
 {
 	unsigned long flags, val, new, timeout = 0;
 	bool ret = true;
-
 	/*
 	 * 1) Don't let napi dequeue from the cpu poll list
 	 *    just in case its running on a different cpu.
@@ -6230,7 +6229,12 @@ bool napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done)
 			timeout = READ_ONCE(n->dev->gro_flush_timeout);
 		n->defer_hard_irqs_count = READ_ONCE(n->dev->napi_defer_hard_irqs);
 	}
-	if (n->defer_hard_irqs_count > 0) {
+	if (napi_prefer_busy_poll(n)) {
+		timeout = READ_ONCE(n->dev->irq_suspend_timeout);
+		if (timeout)
+			ret = false;
+	}
+	if (ret && n->defer_hard_irqs_count > 0) {
 		n->defer_hard_irqs_count--;
 		timeout = READ_ONCE(n->dev->gro_flush_timeout);
 		if (timeout)
@@ -6349,7 +6353,6 @@ static void busy_poll_stop(struct napi_struct *napi, void *have_poll_lock,
 	bool skip_schedule = false;
 	unsigned long timeout;
 	int rc;
-
 	/* Busy polling means there is a high chance device driver hard irq
 	 * could not grab NAPI_STATE_SCHED, and that NAPI_STATE_MISSED was
 	 * set in napi_schedule_prep().
@@ -6366,9 +6369,13 @@ static void busy_poll_stop(struct napi_struct *napi, void *have_poll_lock,
 	bpf_net_ctx = bpf_net_ctx_set(&__bpf_net_ctx);
 
 	if (flags & NAPI_F_PREFER_BUSY_POLL) {
-		napi->defer_hard_irqs_count = READ_ONCE(napi->dev->napi_defer_hard_irqs);
-		timeout = READ_ONCE(napi->dev->gro_flush_timeout);
-		if (napi->defer_hard_irqs_count && timeout) {
+		timeout = READ_ONCE(napi->dev->irq_suspend_timeout);
+		if (!timeout) {
+			napi->defer_hard_irqs_count = READ_ONCE(napi->dev->napi_defer_hard_irqs);
+			if (napi->defer_hard_irqs_count)
+				timeout = READ_ONCE(napi->dev->gro_flush_timeout);
+		}
+		if (timeout) {
 			hrtimer_start(&napi->timer, ns_to_ktime(timeout), HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
 			skip_schedule = true;
 		}
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-12 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-12 12:57 [RFC net-next 0/5] Suspend IRQs during preferred busy poll Joe Damato
2024-08-12 12:57 ` [RFC net-next 1/5] net: Add sysfs parameter irq_suspend_timeout Joe Damato
2024-08-12 12:57 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2024-08-12 12:57 ` [RFC net-next 3/5] net: Add control functions for irq suspension Joe Damato
2024-08-12 12:57 ` [RFC net-next 4/5] eventpoll: Trigger napi_busy_loop, if prefer_busy_poll is set Joe Damato
2024-08-12 13:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-12 16:17     ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-12 17:49       ` Joe Damato
2024-08-12 17:46     ` Joe Damato
2024-08-12 12:57 ` [RFC net-next 5/5] eventpoll: Control irq suspension for prefer_busy_poll Joe Damato
2024-08-12 20:20   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-12 21:47     ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-12 20:19 ` [RFC net-next 0/5] Suspend IRQs during preferred busy poll Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-12 21:46   ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-12 23:03     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-13  0:04       ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-13  1:54         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-13  2:35           ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-13  4:07             ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-13 13:18               ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-14  3:16                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-14 14:19                   ` Joe Damato
2024-08-14 15:08                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-14 15:46                       ` Joe Damato
2024-08-14 19:53                 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2024-08-14 20:42                   ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-16 14:27                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-16 14:59                       ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-16 15:25                         ` Joe Damato
2024-08-16 17:01                           ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-16 20:03                             ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-16 20:58                               ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-17 18:15                                 ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-18 12:55                                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-18 14:51                                     ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-20  2:36                                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-20 14:28                                         ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-17 10:00                             ` Joe Damato
2024-08-14  0:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-14  1:14       ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-20  2:07         ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-20 14:27           ` Martin Karsten

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240812125717.413108-3-jdamato@fastly.com \
    --to=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®