From: Florian Rommel <mail@florommel.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Lorena Kretzschmar <qy15sije@cip.cs.fau.de>,
Stefan Saecherl <stefan.saecherl@fau.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Florian Rommel <mail@florommel.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/kgdb: fix hang on failed breakpoint removal
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 19:43:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240812174338.363838-3-mail@florommel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812174338.363838-1-mail@florommel.de>
On x86, occasionally, the removal of a breakpoint (i.e., removal of
the int3 instruction) fails because the text_mutex is taken by another
CPU (mainly due to the static_key mechanism, I think). The function
kgdb_skipexception catches exceptions from these spurious int3
instructions, bails out of KGDB, and continues execution from the
previous PC address.
However, this led to an endless loop between the int3 instruction and
kgdb_skipexception since the int3 instruction (being still present)
triggered again. This effectively caused the system to hang.
With this patch, we try to remove the concerned spurious int3
instruction in kgdb_skipexception before continuing execution. This
may take a few attempts until the concurrent holders of the text_mutex
have released it, but eventually succeeds and the kernel can continue.
Signed-off-by: Florian Rommel <mail@florommel.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
index 64c332151af7..585a7a72af74 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -723,7 +723,31 @@ void kgdb_arch_exit(void)
int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
if (exception == 3 && kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->ip - 1)) {
+ struct kgdb_bkpt *bpt;
+ int i, error;
+
regs->ip -= 1;
+
+ /*
+ * Try to remove the spurious int3 instruction.
+ * These int3s can result from failed breakpoint removals
+ * in kgdb_arch_remove_breakpoint.
+ */
+ for (bpt = NULL, i = 0; i < KGDB_MAX_BREAKPOINTS; i++) {
+ if (kgdb_break[i].bpt_addr == regs->ip &&
+ kgdb_break[i].state == BP_REMOVED &&
+ (kgdb_break[i].type == BP_BREAKPOINT ||
+ kgdb_break[i].type == BP_POKE_BREAKPOINT)) {
+ bpt = &kgdb_break[i];
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!bpt)
+ return 1;
+ error = kgdb_arch_remove_breakpoint(bpt);
+ if (error)
+ pr_err("skipexception: breakpoint remove failed: %lx\n",
+ bpt->bpt_addr);
return 1;
}
return 0;
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 17:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] kgdb: x86: fix breakpoint removal problems Florian Rommel
2024-08-12 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/kgdb: convert early breakpoints to poke breakpoints Florian Rommel
2024-08-12 18:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-12 17:43 ` Florian Rommel [this message]
2024-08-12 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/kgdb: fix hang on failed breakpoint removal Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-13 11:31 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-08-13 15:06 ` Florian Rommel
2024-08-13 16:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-14 8:51 ` [PATCH WIP] x86/kgdb: trampolines for shadowed instructions Florian Rommel
2024-08-14 10:29 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-08-14 13:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-15 19:51 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-16 11:12 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/kgdb: fix hang on failed breakpoint removal Florian Rommel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240812174338.363838-3-mail@florommel.de \
--to=mail@florommel.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qy15sije@cip.cs.fau.de \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=stefan.saecherl@fau.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®