> > On Sun, 2024-08-11 at 02:22 +0900, Jeongjun Park wrote: > > Since smc_inet6_prot does not initialize ipv6_pinfo_offset, > > inet6_create() copies an incorrect address value, sk + 0 (offset), to > > inet_sk(sk)->pinet6. > > > > In addition, since inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 and smc_sk(sk)->clcsock > > practically point to the same address, when smc_create_clcsk() stores > > the newly created clcsock in smc_sk(sk)->clcsock, inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 > > is corrupted into clcsock. This causes NULL pointer dereference and > > various other memory corruptions. > > > > To solve this, we need to add a smc6_sock structure for > > ipv6_pinfo_offset initialization and modify the smc_sock structure. > > I can not argue substantially with that... There's very little IPv6 > testing that I'm aware of. But do you really need to move that much > code around and change whitespace for you fix? My intention was to add spaces to align the code to the length of the code added to smc_inet6_prot, but I think I accidentally added a tab character. Sorry for the confusion. I'll send you the v2 patch right away. > [--- snip ---] > > > > Fixes: d25a92ccae6b ("net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC") > > Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park > > --- > >  net/smc/smc.h      | 19 ++++++++++--------- > >  net/smc/smc_inet.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- > >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h > > index 34b781e463c4..f4d9338b5ed5 100644 > > --- a/net/smc/smc.h > > +++ b/net/smc/smc.h > > @@ -284,15 +284,6 @@ struct smc_connection { > >   > >  struct smc_sock {                            /* smc sock > > container */ > >       struct sock             sk; > > -     struct socket           *clcsock;       /* internal tcp > > socket */ > > -     void                    (*clcsk_state_change)(struct sock > > *sk); > > -                                             /* original > > stat_change fct. */ > > -     void                    (*clcsk_data_ready)(struct sock > > *sk); > > -                                             /* original > > data_ready fct. */ > > -     void                    (*clcsk_write_space)(struct sock > > *sk); > > -                                             /* original > > write_space fct. */ > > -     void                    (*clcsk_error_report)(struct sock > > *sk); > > -                                             /* original > > error_report fct. */ > >       struct smc_connection   conn;           /* smc connection */ > >       struct smc_sock         *listen_smc;    /* listen > > parent */ > >       struct work_struct      connect_work;   /* handle non- > > blocking connect*/ > > @@ -325,6 +316,16 @@ struct smc_sock {                                /* > > smc sock container */ > >                                               /* protects clcsock > > of a listen > >                                                * socket > >                                                * */ > > +     struct socket           *clcsock;       /* internal tcp > > socket */ > > +     void                    (*clcsk_state_change)(struct sock > > *sk); > > +                                             /* original > > stat_change fct. */ > > +     void                    (*clcsk_data_ready)(struct sock > > *sk); > > +                                             /* original > > data_ready fct. */ > > +     void                    (*clcsk_write_space)(struct sock > > *sk); > > +                                             /* original > > write_space fct. */ > > +     void                    (*clcsk_error_report)(struct sock > > *sk); > > +                                             /* original > > error_report fct. */ > > + > >  }; > >   > >  #define smc_sk(ptr) container_of_const(ptr, struct smc_sock, sk) > > diff --git a/net/smc/smc_inet.c b/net/smc/smc_inet.c > > index bece346dd8e9..3c54faef6042 100644 > > --- a/net/smc/smc_inet.c > > +++ b/net/smc/smc_inet.c > > @@ -60,16 +60,22 @@ static struct inet_protosw smc_inet_protosw = { > >  }; > >   > >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) > > +struct smc6_sock { > > +     struct smc_sock smc; > > +     struct ipv6_pinfo np; > > +}; > > + > >  static struct proto smc_inet6_prot = { > > -     .name           = "INET6_SMC", > > -     .owner          = THIS_MODULE, > > -     .init           = smc_inet_init_sock, > > -     .hash           = smc_hash_sk, > > -     .unhash         = smc_unhash_sk, > > -     .release_cb     = smc_release_cb, > > -     .obj_size       = sizeof(struct smc_sock), > > -     .h.smc_hash     = &smc_v6_hashinfo, > > -     .slab_flags     = SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, > > +     .name                  = "INET6_SMC", > > +     .owner                 = THIS_MODULE, > > +     .init                  = smc_inet_init_sock, > > +     .hash                  = smc_hash_sk, > > +     .unhash                = smc_unhash_sk, > > +     .release_cb            = smc_release_cb, > > +     .obj_size              = sizeof(struct smc6_sock), > > +     .h.smc_hash            = &smc_v6_hashinfo, > > +     .slab_flags            = SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, > > +     .ipv6_pinfo_offset = offsetof(struct smc6_sock, np), > > The line above together with the definition of struct smc6_sock seem to > be the only changes relevant to fixing the issue, IMHO. However, modifying the smc_sock structure is absolutely necessary. This is because smc_sk(sk)->clcsock and inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 point to the same address in the current smc_sock structure definition, so when smc_create_clcsk() is called from inet6_create(), the already initialized inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 will be overwritten by clcsock. > > >  }; > >   > >  static const struct proto_ops smc_inet6_stream_ops = { > > -- > > > > Thanks, Gerd Regards, Jeongjun Park