mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
	neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, urezki@gmail.com,
	frederic@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	leobras@redhat.com, imran.f.khan@oracle.com, riel@surriel.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH rcu 4/4] smp: print only local CPU info when sched_clock goes backward
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:09:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240816043917.26537-4-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240816043600.GA25206@neeraj.linux>

From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>

About 40% of all csd_lock warnings observed in our fleet appear to
be due to sched_clock() going backward in time (usually only a little
bit), resulting in ts0 being larger than ts2.

When the local CPU is at fault, we should print out a message reflecting
that, rather than trying to get the remote CPU's stack trace.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Tested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index b484ee6dcaf6..f25e20617b7e 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -254,6 +254,14 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
 		   csd_lock_timeout_ns == 0))
 		return false;
 
+	if (ts0 > ts2) {
+		/* Our own sched_clock went backward; don't blame another CPU. */
+		ts_delta = ts0 - ts2;
+		pr_alert("sched_clock on CPU %d went backward by %llu ns\n", raw_smp_processor_id(), ts_delta);
+		*ts1 = ts2;
+		return false;
+	}
+
 	firsttime = !*bug_id;
 	if (firsttime)
 		*bug_id = atomic_inc_return(&csd_bug_count);
-- 
2.40.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-16  4:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-16  4:36 [PATCH rcu 0/4] CSD-lock diagnostics updates for v6.12 Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-08-16  4:39 ` [PATCH rcu 1/4] locking/csd_lock: Print large numbers as negatives neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  4:39 ` [PATCH rcu 2/4] locking/csd_lock: Provide an indication of ongoing CSD-lock stall neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  4:39 ` [PATCH rcu 3/4] locking/csd-lock: Use backoff for repeated reports of same incident neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  4:39 ` neeraj.upadhyay [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240816043917.26537-4-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --to=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®