From: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak <sebastian.krzyszkowiak@puri.sm>,
Purism Kernel Team <kernel@puri.sm>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>,
Ramakrishna Pallala <ramakrishna.pallala@intel.com>,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
Cc: Henrik Grimler <henrik@grimler.se>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] power: supply: max17042_battery: Fix SOC threshold calc w/ no current sense
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:51:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240817-max17042-soc-threshold-fix-v1-1-72b45899c3cc@gmail.com> (raw)
Commit 223a3b82834f ("power: supply: max17042_battery: use VFSOC for
capacity when no rsns") made it so that capacity on systems without
current sensing would be read from VFSOC instead of RepSOC. However,
the SOC threshold calculation still read RepSOC to get the SOC
regardless of the current sensing option state.
Fix this by applying the same conditional to determine which register
should be read.
This also seems to be the intended behavior as per the datasheet - SOC
alert config value in MiscCFG on setups without current sensing is set
to a value of 0b11, indicating SOC alerts being generated based on
VFSOC, instead of 0b00 which indicates SOC alerts being generated based
on RepSOC.
This fixes an issue on the Galaxy S3/Midas boards, where the alert
interrupt would be constantly retriggered, causing high CPU usage
on idle (around ~12%-15%).
Fixes: e5f3872d2044 ("max17042: Add support for signalling change in SOC")
Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
---
Commit 223a3b82834f ("power: supply: max17042_battery: use VFSOC for
capacity when no rsns") made it so that capacity on systems without
current sensing would be read from VFSOC instead of RepSOC. However,
the SOC threshold calculation still read RepSOC to get the SOC
regardless of the current sensing option state.
Fix this by applying the same conditional to determine which register
should be read.
This also seems to be the intended behavior as per the datasheet - SOC
alert config value in MiscCFG on setups without current sensing is set
to a value of 0b11, indicating SOC alerts being generated based on
VFSOC, instead of 0b00 which indicates SOC alerts being generated based
on RepSOC.
This fixes an issue on the Galaxy S3/Midas boards, where the alert
interrupt would be constantly retriggered, causing high CPU usage
on idle (around ~12%-15%).
---
drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c
index e7d37e422c3f..496c3e1f2ee6 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c
@@ -853,7 +853,10 @@ static void max17042_set_soc_threshold(struct max17042_chip *chip, u16 off)
/* program interrupt thresholds such that we should
* get interrupt for every 'off' perc change in the soc
*/
- regmap_read(map, MAX17042_RepSOC, &soc);
+ if (chip->pdata->enable_current_sense)
+ regmap_read(map, MAX17042_RepSOC, &soc);
+ else
+ regmap_read(map, MAX17042_VFSOC, &soc);
soc >>= 8;
soc_tr = (soc + off) << 8;
if (off < soc)
---
base-commit: 0c3836482481200ead7b416ca80c68a29cfdaabd
change-id: 20240817-max17042-soc-threshold-fix-e96f15a622e5
Best regards,
--
Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-17 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-17 10:51 Artur Weber [this message]
2024-08-17 18:51 ` Henrik Grimler
2024-08-18 6:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-27 16:58 ` Sebastian Reichel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240817-max17042-soc-threshold-fix-v1-1-72b45899c3cc@gmail.com \
--to=aweber.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=henrik@grimler.se \
--cc=kernel@puri.sm \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=ramakrishna.pallala@intel.com \
--cc=sebastian.krzyszkowiak@puri.sm \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®