From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0064b401.pphosted.com (mx0b-0064b401.pphosted.com [205.220.178.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D338C193415 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 06:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.178.238 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724223348; cv=none; b=c8S/7SYJhpZO+FKtwbyicccB3njVZbXGI9GOpvcQ9q2NtQlEbmRYJwflbr+1iJJW5zjPjmw7IPeZE6hTrU5kMRDWCTOAX1Nog7H6/BtJs9DuT6BYkSweAeHGsHikc4AU5q3FHlSgOKg5fowk5l6iez92/P7tKjyjwkr/OpL1wx8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724223348; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DRsyjL07w6v2g4NFSwNfou54Af18/pM08M9a2CC3nfg=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=m3yKirND6swYpYbCQ41NXY1Usz05sSZGu2LJ1wDVHBVZi7GdeWtD+ioOffSQ9iOWftK0b1DtL404Pim+ZBrJb47zYM9zNDhASMhqCKd2RKsJ5hlFCkPuMV5DdD9mDLPTUlSvEEvUPULGgj6b7IjXyQ1NdSdpW6aGMegyLctkmnE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=windriver.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=windriver.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.178.238 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=windriver.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=windriver.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0250812.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0064b401.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 47L4OTKb001709; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 06:55:22 GMT Received: from ala-exchng01.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-exchng01.wrs.com [147.11.82.252]) by mx0a-0064b401.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 412ju6utg8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Aug 2024 06:55:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ala-exchng01.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.82.252) by ala-exchng01.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.82.252) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 23:55:20 -0700 Received: from pek-lpd-ccm6.wrs.com (147.11.136.210) by ala-exchng01.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.82.252) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.39 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 23:55:18 -0700 From: Lizhi Xu To: CC: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] ocfs2: Fix possible null-ptr-deref in ocfs2_set_buffer_uptodate Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:55:17 +0800 Message-ID: <20240821065517.3844044-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <0dd1d1b4-5e83-449e-af48-3811abd2e6a4@suse.com> References: <0dd1d1b4-5e83-449e-af48-3811abd2e6a4@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 6epE-8XzP66Y1CPRTuUZRVXcCA_PPSn4 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=VdWlP0p9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=66c58f59 cx=c_pps a=/ZJR302f846pc/tyiSlYyQ==:117 a=/ZJR302f846pc/tyiSlYyQ==:17 a=yoJbH4e0A30A:10 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=t7CeM3EgAAAA:8 a=Kczxqsgznl8jAPX-KdsA:9 a=AjGcO6oz07-iQ99wixmX:22 a=FdTzh2GWekK77mhwV6Dw:22 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 6epE-8XzP66Y1CPRTuUZRVXcCA_PPSn4 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-08-21_07,2024-08-19_03,2024-05-17_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=761 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.21.0-2407110000 definitions=main-2408210049 On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:23:08 +0800, Heming Zhao wrote: > Where is my "Reviewed-by" tag, and where is [patch 1/2]? Sorry about your "Reviewed-by" tag, I remove it, if you don't mind, you can add it by yourself. In my previous email, I explicitly stated that only this patch should be sent separately, as the first patch has already been reviewed by two reviewers. If the second patch is updated with the first patch, I personally think it is unnecessary. [patch 1/2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240820094512.2228159-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com/ Lizhi