From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>, Xin Li <xin3.li@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] x86/cpufeature: Add feature dependency checks
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 20:22:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240822202226.862398-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com> (raw)
Currently, the cpuid-deps[] table is only exercised when a particular
feature gets explicitly disabled and clear_cpu_cap() is called. However,
some of these listed dependencies might already be missing during boot.
Unexpected failures can occur when the kernel tries to use such a
feature.
Therefore, add boot time checks for missing feature dependencies and
disable any feature whose dependencies are not met.
Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
---
Arguably, this situation should only happen on broken hardware and it may not
make sense to add such a check to the kernel. OTOH, this can be viewed as a
safety mechanism to make failures more graceful on such configurations in real
or virtual environments.
I feel since we already have the cpuid-deps[] table and the incremental changes
are small, this patch might be a useful addition.
Also, if this check seems worthwhile, would it be useful to combine and rewrite
it with filter_cpuid_features() since it tries to do something similar?
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 4 ++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c | 10 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 0b9611da6c53..347ef04f65ef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
extern void setup_clear_cpu_cap(unsigned int bit);
extern void clear_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int bit);
+extern void filter_feature_dependencies(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
#define setup_force_cpu_cap(bit) do { \
\
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index d4e539d4e158..6b725dbd8db7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1602,6 +1602,7 @@ static void __init early_identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
c->cpu_index = 0;
filter_cpuid_features(c, false);
+ filter_feature_dependencies(c);
if (this_cpu->c_bsp_init)
this_cpu->c_bsp_init(c);
@@ -1854,6 +1855,9 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
/* Filter out anything that depends on CPUID levels we don't have */
filter_cpuid_features(c, true);
+ /* Filter out features that don't have their dependencies met */
+ filter_feature_dependencies(c);
+
/* If the model name is still unset, do table lookup. */
if (!c->x86_model_id[0]) {
const char *p;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
index b7d9f530ae16..88b34a97278a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
@@ -147,3 +147,13 @@ void setup_clear_cpu_cap(unsigned int feature)
{
do_clear_cpu_cap(NULL, feature);
}
+
+void filter_feature_dependencies(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+ const struct cpuid_dep *d;
+
+ for (d = cpuid_deps; d->feature; d++) {
+ if (boot_cpu_has(d->feature) && !boot_cpu_has(d->depends))
+ do_clear_cpu_cap(c, d->feature);
+ }
+}
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-22 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 20:22 Sohil Mehta [this message]
2024-08-22 23:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-23 19:05 ` Sohil Mehta
2024-08-26 20:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-26 21:47 ` Sohil Mehta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240822202226.862398-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®