From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: amritha.nambiar@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, peter@typeblog.net, m2shafiei@uwaterloo.ca,
bjorn@rivosinc.com, hch@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, skhawaja@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>,
Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/6] net: Suspend softirq when prefer_busy_poll is set
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 17:30:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240823173103.94978-3-jdamato@fastly.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240823173103.94978-1-jdamato@fastly.com>
From: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>
When NAPI_F_PREFER_BUSY_POLL is set during busy_poll_stop and the
irq_suspend_timeout sysfs is nonzero, this timeout is used to defer
softirq scheduling, potentially longer than gro_flush_timeout. This can
be used to effectively suspend softirq processing during the time it
takes for an application to process data and return to the next
busy-poll.
The call to napi->poll in busy_poll_stop might lead to an invocation of
napi_complete_done, but the prefer-busy flag is still set at that time,
so the same logic is used to defer softirq scheduling for
irq_suspend_timeout.
Signed-off-by: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>
Co-developed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Tested-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Tested-by: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>
---
net/core/dev.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 3bf325ec25a3..74060ba866d4 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6230,7 +6230,12 @@ bool napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done)
timeout = READ_ONCE(n->dev->gro_flush_timeout);
n->defer_hard_irqs_count = READ_ONCE(n->dev->napi_defer_hard_irqs);
}
- if (n->defer_hard_irqs_count > 0) {
+ if (napi_prefer_busy_poll(n)) {
+ timeout = READ_ONCE(n->dev->irq_suspend_timeout);
+ if (timeout)
+ ret = false;
+ }
+ if (ret && n->defer_hard_irqs_count > 0) {
n->defer_hard_irqs_count--;
timeout = READ_ONCE(n->dev->gro_flush_timeout);
if (timeout)
@@ -6366,9 +6371,13 @@ static void busy_poll_stop(struct napi_struct *napi, void *have_poll_lock,
bpf_net_ctx = bpf_net_ctx_set(&__bpf_net_ctx);
if (flags & NAPI_F_PREFER_BUSY_POLL) {
- napi->defer_hard_irqs_count = READ_ONCE(napi->dev->napi_defer_hard_irqs);
- timeout = READ_ONCE(napi->dev->gro_flush_timeout);
- if (napi->defer_hard_irqs_count && timeout) {
+ timeout = READ_ONCE(napi->dev->irq_suspend_timeout);
+ if (!timeout) {
+ napi->defer_hard_irqs_count = READ_ONCE(napi->dev->napi_defer_hard_irqs);
+ if (napi->defer_hard_irqs_count)
+ timeout = READ_ONCE(napi->dev->gro_flush_timeout);
+ }
+ if (timeout) {
hrtimer_start(&napi->timer, ns_to_ktime(timeout), HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
skip_schedule = true;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-23 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 17:30 [PATCH net-next 0/6] Suspend IRQs during application busy periods Joe Damato
2024-08-23 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: Add sysfs parameter irq_suspend_timeout Joe Damato
2024-08-23 17:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-08-23 20:15 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-23 17:30 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2024-08-23 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: Add control functions for irq suspension Joe Damato
2024-08-23 17:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-08-23 18:02 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-23 18:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-08-23 20:21 ` Martin Karsten
2024-08-23 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] eventpoll: Trigger napi_busy_loop, if prefer_busy_poll is set Joe Damato
2024-08-23 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] eventpoll: Control irq suspension for prefer_busy_poll Joe Damato
2024-08-23 17:30 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] docs: networking: Describe irq suspension Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240823173103.94978-3-jdamato@fastly.com \
--to=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=m2shafiei@uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peter@typeblog.net \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®