From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <joro@8bytes.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
<ubizjak@gmail.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>, <jon.grimm@amd.com>,
<santosh.shukla@amd.com>, <pandoh@google.com>,
<kumaranand@google.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] iommu/amd: Introduce helper functions to access and update 256-bit DTE
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 12:13:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240906121308.5013-3-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240906121308.5013-1-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
The current implementation does not follow 128-bit write requirement
to update DTE as specified in the AMD I/O Virtualization Techonology
(IOMMU) Specification.
Therefore, modify the struct dev_table_entry to contain union of u128 data
array, and introduce two helper functions:
* update_dte256() to update DTE using two 128-bit cmpxchg
operations to update 256-bit DTE with the modified structure.
* get_dte256() to copy 256-bit DTE to the provided structrue.
In addition, when access/update 256-bit DTE, it needs to be locked
to prevent cmpxchg128 failure and data tearing. Therefore, introduce
a per-DTE spin_lock struct dev_data.dte_lock to provide synchronization
across get_dte256() and update_dte256().
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu_types.h | 6 ++-
drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu_types.h b/drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu_types.h
index c9f9a598eb82..1836da2d9e60 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu_types.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/amd_iommu_types.h
@@ -833,6 +833,7 @@ struct devid_map {
struct iommu_dev_data {
/*Protect against attach/detach races */
spinlock_t lock;
+ spinlock_t dte_lock; /* DTE lock for 256-bit access */
struct list_head list; /* For domain->dev_list */
struct llist_node dev_data_list; /* For global dev_data_list */
@@ -883,7 +884,10 @@ extern struct amd_iommu *amd_iommus[MAX_IOMMUS];
* Structure defining one entry in the device table
*/
struct dev_table_entry {
- u64 data[4];
+ union {
+ u64 data[4];
+ u128 data128[2];
+ };
};
/*
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
index 87c5385ce3f2..b994e7837306 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
@@ -85,6 +85,45 @@ static void set_dte_entry(struct amd_iommu *iommu,
*
****************************************************************************/
+static void update_dte256(struct amd_iommu *iommu, struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data,
+ struct dev_table_entry *new)
+{
+ struct dev_table_entry *dev_table = get_dev_table(iommu);
+ struct dev_table_entry *ptr = &dev_table[dev_data->devid];
+ struct dev_table_entry old;
+ u128 tmp;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&dev_data->dte_lock);
+
+ old.data128[0] = ptr->data128[0];
+ old.data128[1] = ptr->data128[1];
+
+ tmp = cmpxchg128(&ptr->data128[1], old.data128[1], new->data128[1]);
+ if (tmp == old.data128[1]) {
+ if (!try_cmpxchg128(&ptr->data128[0], &old.data128[0], new->data128[0])) {
+ /* Restore hi 128-bit */
+ cmpxchg128(&ptr->data128[1], new->data128[1], tmp);
+ pr_err("%s: Failed. devid=%#x, dte=%016llx:%016llx:%016llx:%016llx\n",
+ __func__, dev_data->devid, new->data[0], new->data[1],
+ new->data[2], new->data[3]);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void get_dte256(struct amd_iommu *iommu, struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data,
+ struct dev_table_entry *dte)
+{
+ struct dev_table_entry *ptr;
+ struct dev_table_entry *dev_table = get_dev_table(iommu);
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&dev_data->dte_lock);
+
+ ptr = &dev_table[dev_data->devid];
+
+ dte->data128[0] = ptr->data128[0];
+ dte->data128[1] = ptr->data128[1];
+}
+
static inline bool pdom_is_v2_pgtbl_mode(struct protection_domain *pdom)
{
return (pdom && (pdom->pd_mode == PD_MODE_V2));
@@ -205,6 +244,7 @@ static struct iommu_dev_data *alloc_dev_data(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u16 devid)
return NULL;
spin_lock_init(&dev_data->lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&dev_data->dte_lock);
dev_data->devid = devid;
ratelimit_default_init(&dev_data->rs);
@@ -232,9 +272,11 @@ static struct iommu_dev_data *search_dev_data(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u16 devid
static int clone_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
{
+ struct dev_table_entry dte;
struct amd_iommu *iommu;
- struct dev_table_entry *dev_table;
+ struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data, *alias_data;
u16 devid = pci_dev_id(pdev);
+ int ret;
if (devid == alias)
return 0;
@@ -243,13 +285,28 @@ static int clone_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
if (!iommu)
return 0;
- amd_iommu_set_rlookup_table(iommu, alias);
- dev_table = get_dev_table(iommu);
- memcpy(dev_table[alias].data,
- dev_table[devid].data,
- sizeof(dev_table[alias].data));
+ /* Get DTE for pdev */
+ dev_data = dev_iommu_priv_get(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!dev_data)
+ return -EINVAL;
- return 0;
+ spin_lock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
+ get_dte256(iommu, dev_data, &dte);
+ spin_unlock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
+
+ /* Setup for alias */
+ alias_data = search_dev_data(iommu, alias);
+ if (!alias_data) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock(&alias_data->dte_lock);
+ update_dte256(iommu, alias_data, &dte);
+ amd_iommu_set_rlookup_table(iommu, alias);
+ spin_unlock(&alias_data->dte_lock);
+out:
+ return ret;
}
static void clone_aliases(struct amd_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev)
@@ -583,10 +640,15 @@ static void amd_iommu_uninit_device(struct device *dev)
static void dump_dte_entry(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u16 devid)
{
int i;
- struct dev_table_entry *dev_table = get_dev_table(iommu);
+ struct dev_table_entry dte;
+ struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data = find_dev_data(iommu, devid);
+
+ spin_lock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
+ get_dte256(iommu, dev_data, &dte);
+ spin_unlock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
- pr_err("DTE[%d]: %016llx\n", i, dev_table[devid].data[i]);
+ pr_err("DTE[%d]: %016llx\n", i, dte.data[i]);
}
static void dump_command(unsigned long phys_addr)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-06 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-06 12:13 [PATCH v3 0/5] iommu/amd: Use 128-bit cmpxchg operation to update DTE Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-06 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu/amd: Disable AMD IOMMU if CMPXCHG16B feature is not supported Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-06 16:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-09 15:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-16 17:19 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2024-09-16 16:11 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2024-09-23 18:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-06 12:13 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2024-09-06 15:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iommu/amd: Introduce helper functions to access and update 256-bit DTE Jacob Pan
2024-09-06 17:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-16 16:12 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
[not found] ` <66db2589.170a0220.6f57.d691SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2024-09-06 19:31 ` Uros Bizjak
2024-09-07 13:36 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-06 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu/amd: Modify set_dte_entry() to use 256-bit DTE helpers Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-06 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iommu/amd: Modify clear_dte_entry() to avoid in-place update Suravee Suthikulpanit
2024-09-06 18:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-06 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] iommu/amd: Do not update DTE in-place in amd_iommu_set_dirty_tracking and set_dte_irq_entry Suravee Suthikulpanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240906121308.5013-3-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kumaranand@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pandoh@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®