[PATCH v1] proc: Fix typo in the comment

[Yan Zhen <yanzhen@vivo.com>]

The deference here confuses me. 

Maybe here want to say that because show_fd_locks() does not dereference
the files pointer, using the stale value of the files pointer is safe.

Correctly spelled comments make it easier for the reader to understand
the code.

replace 'deferences' with 'dereferences' in the comment &
replace 'inialized' with 'initialized' in the comment.

Signed-off-by: Yan Zhen <yanzhen@vivo.com>
---
 fs/proc/fd.c    | 2 +-
 fs/proc/kcore.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/fd.c b/fs/proc/fd.c
index 623780449..1f54a54bf 100644
--- a/fs/proc/fd.c
+++ b/fs/proc/fd.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		   real_mount(file->f_path.mnt)->mnt_id,
 		   file_inode(file)->i_ino);
 
-	/* show_fd_locks() never deferences files so a stale value is safe */
+	/* show_fd_locks() never dereferences files, so a stale value is safe */
 	show_fd_locks(m, file, files);
 	if (seq_has_overflowed(m))
 		goto out;
diff --git a/fs/proc/kcore.c b/fs/proc/kcore.c
index 8e08a9a1b..7d0acdad7 100644
--- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
+++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int kcore_ram_list(struct list_head *list)
 	int nid, ret;
 	unsigned long end_pfn;
 
-	/* Not inialized....update now */
+	/* Not initialized....update now */
 	/* find out "max pfn" */
 	end_pfn = 0;
 	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
-- 
2.34.1