From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
syzbot+20d7e439f76bbbd863a7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to don't set SB_RDONLY in f2fs_handle_critical_error()
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:07:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240910030713.3716318-1-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 58 at kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0
Workqueue: events destroy_super_work
RIP: 0010:rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177
Call Trace:
percpu_free_rwsem+0x41/0x80 kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c:42
destroy_super_work+0xec/0x130 fs/super.c:282
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3231 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3312
worker_thread+0x86d/0xd40 kernel/workqueue.c:3390
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
As Christian Brauner pointed out [1]: the root cause is f2fs sets
SB_RDONLY flag in internal function, rather than setting the flag
covered w/ sb->s_umount semaphore via remount procedure, then below
race condition causes this bug:
- freeze_super()
- sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE)
- sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT)
- sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS)
- f2fs_handle_critical_error
- sb->s_flags |= SB_RDONLY
- thaw_super
- thaw_super_locked
- sb_rdonly() is true, so it skips
sb_freeze_unlock(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS)
- deactivate_locked_super
Since f2fs has almost the same logic as ext4 [2] when handling critical
error in filesystem if it mounts w/ errors=remount-ro option:
- set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag which indicates filesystem is stopped
- record errors to superblock
- set SB_RDONLY falg
Once we set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag, all writable interfaces can detect the
flag and stop any further updates on filesystem. So, it is safe to not
set SB_RDONLY flag, let's remove the logic and keep in line w/ ext4 [3].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729-himbeeren-funknetz-96e62f9c7aee@brauner
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729132721.hxih6ehigadqf7wx@quack3
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240805201241.27286-1-jack@suse.cz
Fixes: b62e71be2110 ("f2fs: support errors=remount-ro|continue|panic mountoption")
Reported-by: syzbot+20d7e439f76bbbd863a7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000b90a8e061e21d12f@google.com/
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/super.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index e774bdf875b2..acfd000c6bb0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -4207,12 +4207,14 @@ void f2fs_handle_critical_error(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned char reason,
}
f2fs_warn(sbi, "Remounting filesystem read-only");
+
/*
- * Make sure updated value of ->s_mount_flags will be visible before
- * ->s_flags update
+ * We have already set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag to stop all updates
+ * to filesystem, so it doesn't need to set SB_RDONLY flag here
+ * because the flag should be set covered w/ sb->s_umount semaphore
+ * via remount procedure, otherwise, it will confuse code like
+ * freeze_super() which will lead to deadlocks and other problems.
*/
- smp_wmb();
- sb->s_flags |= SB_RDONLY;
}
static void f2fs_record_error_work(struct work_struct *work)
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 3:07 Chao Yu [this message]
2024-09-10 8:54 ` Christian Brauner
2024-09-12 15:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-16 21:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240910030713.3716318-1-chao@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+20d7e439f76bbbd863a7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®