From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
brgerst@gmail.com, samitolvanen@google.com, kees@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/unwind/orc: Fix unwind for newly forked tasks
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:11:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240913231108.a3ukhoyhp2xactdq@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240913024501.1337327-1-zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:45:01AM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
> When arch_stack_walk_reliable() is called to unwind for newly forked
> tasks, the return value is negative which means the call stack is
> unreliable. This obviously does not meet expectations.
>
> The root cause is that after commit 3aec4ecb3d1f ("x86: Rewrite
> ret_from_fork() in C"), the 'ret_addr' of newly forked task is changed
> to 'ret_from_fork_asm' (see copy_thread()), then at the start of the
> unwind, it is incorrectly interprets not as a "signal" one because
> 'ret_from_fork' is still used to determine the initial "signal" (see
> __unwind_start()). Then the address gets incorrectly decremented in the
> call to orc_find() (see unwind_next_frame()) and resulting in the
> incorrect ORC data.
>
> To fix it, check 'ret_from_fork_asm' rather than 'ret_from_fork' in
> __unwind_start().
>
> Fixes: 3aec4ecb3d1f ("x86: Rewrite ret_from_fork() in C")
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
Thanks!
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-13 2:45 Zheng Yejian
2024-09-13 23:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2024-10-11 6:50 ` Zheng Yejian
2024-10-11 15:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-10-12 7:34 ` Zheng Yejian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240913231108.a3ukhoyhp2xactdq@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®