From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD4D374EA; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 21:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726607991; cv=none; b=R6oWD6wG1b+vWmHSaj6G4ICX/W4eaQOQao/ApMIUeJ7EOMhyypica+ok6yw481HwHa401uYE6SMTCrzowWOX9NgZPaXFc0B61NBX4hB7KiyPNo1iKVhaX5Yk08LrPnXRnRYiqkG6mvRPrjZhnTLmP37LUwcWgMVNTEO6Q4NKtyc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726607991; c=relaxed/simple; bh=19cw6zZQnCL1Bd8cjqmQv07SG13S1pvml2RAS/6079Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=F8WuID/bpfg695jtu3LKxpCVLdO2uw+kEcXB6mvly3x3EP/r1qw/H5wMbG1y85oV8Usevc6HnHgcI/FOZHc+5nn8kt1AqbDega/TRD4tAZbV9iv1/vVzIq1dlIM766s3j4spBPlVhYv6BDO4f4+9I9dVH7pxu4ffuS6q+u+ognk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VfPVKvzp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VfPVKvzp" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCD86C4CEC5; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 21:19:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1726607991; bh=19cw6zZQnCL1Bd8cjqmQv07SG13S1pvml2RAS/6079Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VfPVKvzpVxZaOjs6873tkODB8DNV2a1E6aZBNy8THW7mfTr+ocmetwfaUhEU9ndWT 1IZ2m7bbwCfpYEGRG3PlRDr8JNeHplvjdl5iVStvWa942CGaUT5Cgvac4GqLYQO+H9 oXUrOea+4ZapzIVMAY1JgmjCtrqK3Xnn5LuUnxmiMUhBMTjSXdn+MXrcxZQT7sR1SU iKUaijv0/ds5I9fLSpADxwbxBoUOjMM6sA8e/dmLfn2VlrAHUG7SFYiMJTI4UjY84g F/Bmj8756t2UepygavD4gOCTygo3JcwZndNE1WNgCfCTxKhICUJ4oy/6bUVOrrDVOM CHaM7lB4JOsFA== Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 22:19:54 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Peter Griffin Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Alim Akhtar , Tudor Ambarus , Will McVicker , kernel-team@android.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: add myself for Google Tensor SoC Message-ID: <20240917-pentagon-veteran-952cdac50e6c@squawk> References: <20240916-max20339-dts-v1-0-2f7ed7c24e83@linaro.org> <20240916-max20339-dts-v1-3-2f7ed7c24e83@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ClZoFYlarA2I48nY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --ClZoFYlarA2I48nY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 08:42:03PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote: > Hi Andr=E9, >=20 > On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 17:58, Andr=E9 Draszik = wrote: > > > > Add myself as maintainer for the Google Tensor SoC alongside Peter. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andr=E9 Draszik > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 2cdd7cacec86..b6edb21b4f2d 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -9669,6 +9669,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/= kernel/git/chrome-platform/linux.git > > F: drivers/firmware/google/ > > > > GOOGLE TENSOR SoC SUPPORT > > +M: Andr=E9 Draszik >=20 > Please update this to: - >=20 > +R: Andr=E9 Draszik >=20 > The definition of which is >=20 > R: Designated *Reviewer*: FullName > These reviewers should be CCed on patches. I find this email really weird. If you discussed something off-list and Andre misunderstood that you wanted him as a reviewer not a maintainer, that's fine - but you need to explain why to the rest of us. If it were not for the fact you share an employer, I'd find this to be a kinda rude way of denying someone co-maintainer status. --ClZoFYlarA2I48nY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZunydwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0g8MAP9vzQIab4yoFF2S8dlflBDMtFEpaXoOJ9P68KtWhnokQwEA3uKe70t2le+L HDDr4hG7THiFy8nJNo1GVR1mq0jaCgc= =JH5Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ClZoFYlarA2I48nY--