From: Linu Cherian <lcherian@marvell.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<gakula@marvell.com>, <hkelam@marvell.com>, <sbhatta@marvell.com>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] octeontx2-af: Knobs for NPC default rule counters
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 10:08:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240917043826.GA720400@hyd1403.caveonetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240914081317.GA8319@kernel.org>
Hi Simon,
On 2024-09-14 at 13:43:17, Simon Horman (horms@kernel.org) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:44:49PM +0530, Linu Cherian wrote:
> > Add devlink knobs to enable/disable counters on NPC
> > default rule entries.
> >
> > Introduce lowlevel variant of rvu_mcam_remove/add_counter_from/to_rule
> > for better code reuse, which assumes necessary locks are taken at
> > higher level.
> >
> > Sample command to enable default rule counters:
> > devlink dev param set <dev> name npc_def_rule_cntr value true cmode runtime
> >
> > Sample command to read the counter:
> > cat /sys/kernel/debug/cn10k/npc/mcam_rules
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Linu Cherian <lcherian@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > Changelog from v1:
> > Removed wrong mutex_unlock invocations.
>
> Hi Linu,
>
> This patch seems to be doing two things:
>
> 1) Refactoring some functions to have locking and non-locking variants.
> By LoC this is appears the bulk of the code changed in this patch.
> It also appears to be straightforward.
>
> 2) Adding devlink knobs
>
> As this is a user-facing change it probably requires a deeper review
> than 1)
>
> I would suggest, that for review, it would be very nice to split
> 1) and 2) into separate patches. Maybe including a note in the patch
> for 1) that the refactor will be used in the following patch for 2).
>
Ack. Will split into two while reposting.
> As for the code changes themselves, I did look over them,
> and I didn't see any problems.
Linu Cherian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-17 4:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-12 16:14 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] octeontx2: Few debugfs enhancements Linu Cherian
2024-09-12 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] octeontx2-af: Knobs for NPC default rule counters Linu Cherian
2024-09-14 8:13 ` Simon Horman
2024-09-17 4:38 ` Linu Cherian [this message]
2024-09-17 8:12 ` Simon Horman
2024-09-12 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] octeontx2-af: debugfs: Add Channel info to RPM map Linu Cherian
2024-09-14 4:43 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] octeontx2: Few debugfs enhancements Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-14 4:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240917043826.GA720400@hyd1403.caveonetworks.com \
--to=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®