From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@nvidia.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the mlx5-next tree
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:53:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240917115352.12f0de91@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240912120619.38fa7556@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1526 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:06:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
>
> between commit:
>
> c772a2c69018 ("net/mlx5: Add IFC related stuff for data direct")
>
> from the mlx5-next tree and commit:
>
> 34c626c3004a ("net/mlx5: Added missing mlx5_ifc definition for HW Steering")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
> index 65bbf535b365,b6f8e3834bd3..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
> @@@ -313,7 -315,7 +315,8 @@@ enum
> MLX5_CMD_OP_MODIFY_VHCA_STATE = 0xb0e,
> MLX5_CMD_OP_SYNC_CRYPTO = 0xb12,
> MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOW_OTHER_VHCA_ACCESS = 0xb16,
> + MLX5_CMD_OPCODE_QUERY_VUID = 0xb22,
> + MLX5_CMD_OP_GENERATE_WQE = 0xb17,
> MLX5_CMD_OP_MAX
> };
>
This is now a conflict between the rdma tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-17 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-12 2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-17 1:53 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240917115352.12f0de91@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=kliteyn@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®