From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 11:43:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240924084343.syhmwim5swcgppha@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240913203549.3081071-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 11:35:49PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Alexander Sverdlin presents 2 problems during shutdown with the
> lan9303 driver. One is specific to lan9303 and the other just happens
> to reproduce there.
>
> The first problem is that lan9303 is unique among DSA drivers in that it
> calls dev_get_drvdata() at "arbitrary runtime" (not probe, not shutdown,
> not remove):
>
> phy_state_machine()
> -> ...
> -> dsa_user_phy_read()
> -> ds->ops->phy_read()
> -> lan9303_phy_read()
> -> chip->ops->phy_read()
> -> lan9303_mdio_phy_read()
> -> dev_get_drvdata()
>
> But we never stop the phy_state_machine(), so it may continue to run
> after dsa_switch_shutdown(). Our common pattern in all DSA drivers is
> to set drvdata to NULL to suppress the remove() method that may come
> afterwards. But in this case it will result in an NPD.
>
> The second problem is that the way in which we set
> dp->conduit->dsa_ptr = NULL; is concurrent with receive packet
> processing. dsa_switch_rcv() checks once whether dev->dsa_ptr is NULL,
> but afterwards, rather than continuing to use that non-NULL value,
> dev->dsa_ptr is dereferenced again and again without NULL checks:
> dsa_conduit_find_user() and many other places. In between dereferences,
> there is no locking to ensure that what was valid once continues to be
> valid.
>
> Both problems have the common aspect that closing the conduit interface
> solves them.
>
> In the first case, dev_close(conduit) triggers the NETDEV_GOING_DOWN
> event in dsa_user_netdevice_event() which closes user ports as well.
> dsa_port_disable_rt() calls phylink_stop(), which synchronously stops
> the phylink state machine, and ds->ops->phy_read() will thus no longer
> call into the driver after this point.
>
> In the second case, dev_close(conduit) should do this, as per
> Documentation/networking/driver.rst:
>
> | Quiescence
> | ----------
> |
> | After the ndo_stop routine has been called, the hardware must
> | not receive or transmit any data. All in flight packets must
> | be aborted. If necessary, poll or wait for completion of
> | any reset commands.
>
> So it should be sufficient to ensure that later, when we zeroize
> conduit->dsa_ptr, there will be no concurrent dsa_switch_rcv() call
> on this conduit.
>
> The addition of the netif_device_detach() function is to ensure that
> ioctls, rtnetlinks and ethtool requests on the user ports no longer
> propagate down to the driver - we're no longer prepared to handle them.
>
> The race condition actually did not exist when commit 0650bf52b31f
> ("net: dsa: be compatible with masters which unregister on shutdown")
> first introduced dsa_switch_shutdown(). It was created later, when we
> stopped unregistering the user interfaces from a bad spot, and we just
> replaced that sequence with a racy zeroization of conduit->dsa_ptr
> (one which doesn't ensure that the interfaces aren't up).
>
> Reported-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/2d2e3bba17203c14a5ffdabc174e3b6bbb9ad438.camel@siemens.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/c1bf4de54e829111e0e4a70e7bd1cf523c9550ff.camel@siemens.com/
> Fixes: ee534378f005 ("net: dsa: fix panic when DSA master device unbinds on shutdown")
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
> Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> ---
Andrew, Florian, FYI: this is marked as "Needs ACK" in patchwork.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-24 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-13 20:35 Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-24 8:43 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2024-09-24 8:52 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-10-01 8:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240924084343.syhmwim5swcgppha@skbuf \
--to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®