mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch v4 10/27] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 10:48:51 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240927084817.512919719@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927083900.989915582@linutronix.de>

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The handling of the timer overrun in the signal code is inconsistent as it
takes previous overruns into account. This is just wrong as after the
reprogramming of a timer the overrun count starts over from a clean state,
i.e. 0.

Make the accounting in send_sigqueue() consistent with that.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

---
 kernel/signal.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index a407724f1267..a99274287902 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1961,6 +1961,34 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct pid *pid, enum pid_type type, int s
 	 */
 	q->info.si_sys_private = si_private;
 
+	/*
+	 * Set the overrun count to zero unconditionally. The posix timer
+	 * code does not self rearm periodic timers. They are rearmed from
+	 * dequeue_signal().
+	 *
+	 * But there is a situation where @q is already enqueued:
+	 *
+	 * 1) timer_settime()
+	 *      arm_timer()
+	 * 2) timer_expires()
+	 *      send_sigqueue(@q)
+	 *        enqueue(@q)
+	 * 3) timer_settime()
+	 *      arm_timer()
+	 * 4) timer_expires()
+	 *      send_sigqueue(@q) <- Observes @q already queued
+	 *
+	 * In this case incrementing si_overrun does not make sense because
+	 * there is no relationship between timer_settime() #1 and #2.
+	 *
+	 * The POSIX specification is useful as always: "The effect of
+	 * disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
+	 * notifications is unspecified."
+	 *
+	 * Just do the sensible thing and reset the overrun.
+	 */
+	q->info.si_overrun = 0;
+
 	ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
 	result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED;
 	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, false))
@@ -1968,15 +1996,9 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct pid *pid, enum pid_type type, int s
 
 	ret = 0;
 	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
-		/*
-		 * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
-		 * the overrun count.
-		 */
-		q->info.si_overrun++;
 		result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
 		goto out;
 	}
-	q->info.si_overrun = 0;
 
 	signalfd_notify(t, sig);
 	pending = (type != PIDTYPE_PID) ? &t->signal->shared_pending : &t->pending;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-27  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-27  8:48 [patch v4 00/27] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 01/27] signal: Confine POSIX_TIMERS properly Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 12:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 02/27] signal: Prevent user space from setting si_sys_private Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 12:37   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-09-27 13:40   ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 03/27] signal: Get rid of resched_timer logic Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 13:08   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-09-27 13:53   ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 04/27] posix-timers: Cure si_sys_private race Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 14:02   ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 05/27] signal: Allow POSIX timer signals to be dropped Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 06/27] posix-timers: Drop signal if timer has been deleted or reprogrammed Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 07/27] posix-timers: Rename k_itimer::it_requeue_pending Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 08/27] posix-timers: Add proper state tracking Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 09/27] posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 11/27] posix-cpu-timers: Use dedicated flag for CPU timer nanosleep Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 12/27] posix-timers: Add a refcount to struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 13/27] signal: Split up __sigqueue_alloc() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 14/27] signal: Provide posixtimer_sigqueue_init() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 15/27] signal: Add sys_private_ptr to siginfo::_sifields:: _timer Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 16/27] posix-timers: Store PID type in the timer Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:48 ` [patch v4 17/27] signal: Refactor send_sigqueue() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:49 ` [patch v4 18/27] posix-timers: Embed sigqueue in struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:49 ` [patch v4 19/27] signal: Cleanup unused posix-timer leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:49 ` [patch v4 20/27] signal: Add task argument to flush_sigqueue_mask() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:49 ` [patch v4 21/27] signal: Provide ignored_posix_timers list Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:49 ` [patch v4 22/27] posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:49 ` [patch v4 23/27] signal: Handle ignored signals in do_sigaction(action != SIG_IGN) Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:49 ` [patch v4 24/27] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:49 ` [patch v4 25/27] posix-timers: Cleanup SIG_IGN workaround leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:49 ` [patch v4 26/27] alarmtimers: Remove the throttle mechanism from alarm_forward_now() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27  8:49 ` [patch v4 27/27] alarmtimers: Remove return value from alarm functions Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 14:39 ` [patch v4 00/27] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Eric W. Biederman
2024-09-27 19:24   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240927084817.512919719@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome