From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch v4 10/27] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 10:48:51 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240927084817.512919719@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927083900.989915582@linutronix.de>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The handling of the timer overrun in the signal code is inconsistent as it
takes previous overruns into account. This is just wrong as after the
reprogramming of a timer the overrun count starts over from a clean state,
i.e. 0.
Make the accounting in send_sigqueue() consistent with that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/signal.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index a407724f1267..a99274287902 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1961,6 +1961,34 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct pid *pid, enum pid_type type, int s
*/
q->info.si_sys_private = si_private;
+ /*
+ * Set the overrun count to zero unconditionally. The posix timer
+ * code does not self rearm periodic timers. They are rearmed from
+ * dequeue_signal().
+ *
+ * But there is a situation where @q is already enqueued:
+ *
+ * 1) timer_settime()
+ * arm_timer()
+ * 2) timer_expires()
+ * send_sigqueue(@q)
+ * enqueue(@q)
+ * 3) timer_settime()
+ * arm_timer()
+ * 4) timer_expires()
+ * send_sigqueue(@q) <- Observes @q already queued
+ *
+ * In this case incrementing si_overrun does not make sense because
+ * there is no relationship between timer_settime() #1 and #2.
+ *
+ * The POSIX specification is useful as always: "The effect of
+ * disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
+ * notifications is unspecified."
+ *
+ * Just do the sensible thing and reset the overrun.
+ */
+ q->info.si_overrun = 0;
+
ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED;
if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, false))
@@ -1968,15 +1996,9 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct pid *pid, enum pid_type type, int s
ret = 0;
if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
- /*
- * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
- * the overrun count.
- */
- q->info.si_overrun++;
result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
goto out;
}
- q->info.si_overrun = 0;
signalfd_notify(t, sig);
pending = (type != PIDTYPE_PID) ? &t->signal->shared_pending : &t->pending;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-27 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-27 8:48 [patch v4 00/27] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 01/27] signal: Confine POSIX_TIMERS properly Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 12:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 02/27] signal: Prevent user space from setting si_sys_private Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 12:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-09-27 13:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 03/27] signal: Get rid of resched_timer logic Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 13:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-09-27 13:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 04/27] posix-timers: Cure si_sys_private race Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 14:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 05/27] signal: Allow POSIX timer signals to be dropped Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 06/27] posix-timers: Drop signal if timer has been deleted or reprogrammed Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 07/27] posix-timers: Rename k_itimer::it_requeue_pending Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 08/27] posix-timers: Add proper state tracking Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 09/27] posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 11/27] posix-cpu-timers: Use dedicated flag for CPU timer nanosleep Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 12/27] posix-timers: Add a refcount to struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 13/27] signal: Split up __sigqueue_alloc() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 14/27] signal: Provide posixtimer_sigqueue_init() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 15/27] signal: Add sys_private_ptr to siginfo::_sifields:: _timer Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 16/27] posix-timers: Store PID type in the timer Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:48 ` [patch v4 17/27] signal: Refactor send_sigqueue() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:49 ` [patch v4 18/27] posix-timers: Embed sigqueue in struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:49 ` [patch v4 19/27] signal: Cleanup unused posix-timer leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:49 ` [patch v4 20/27] signal: Add task argument to flush_sigqueue_mask() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:49 ` [patch v4 21/27] signal: Provide ignored_posix_timers list Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:49 ` [patch v4 22/27] posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:49 ` [patch v4 23/27] signal: Handle ignored signals in do_sigaction(action != SIG_IGN) Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:49 ` [patch v4 24/27] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:49 ` [patch v4 25/27] posix-timers: Cleanup SIG_IGN workaround leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:49 ` [patch v4 26/27] alarmtimers: Remove the throttle mechanism from alarm_forward_now() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 8:49 ` [patch v4 27/27] alarmtimers: Remove return value from alarm functions Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-27 14:39 ` [patch v4 00/27] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Eric W. Biederman
2024-09-27 19:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240927084817.512919719@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome