From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f173.google.com (mail-pf1-f173.google.com [209.85.210.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FC9A18A6C6 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727713473; cv=none; b=hB3EXBbEPdSbDfFElOYvIUdYHcjMjO24x2UIuCWScPtY9ImFz12XL8EQcAUEw3U0sYvxkt+BS+xtY09BfO3ypB3uECzUaNM0VYCCcKwNusLAyx2pNAF8CaHWmqfIQDHZpQ3B4ILfd9oHaJkXu23LSMFqkWfZoi3JAJX8y75TfIA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727713473; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MXTkDSIJkG4+O0I/bwpPCZQj+y4yghFFQxAInPbhkbc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=dgwFhmTH+5BteuZJIMBR/EpCqDHpON7iRF83wb/m1wtNCKwzQFMpRKJNI4GN3fY0ZFJMkDwv39gzzkJAgoLzJhWMbSYFc6FwYQGAvm2GtO9LfPcGT+4+r1mM7+mO58k6u2TrBR6ixht/EBDtP4I5ebC73KjDPDhKipMuTrNCGmY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=fastly.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fastly.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com header.i=@fastly.com header.b=tmGS/2D0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=fastly.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fastly.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com header.i=@fastly.com header.b="tmGS/2D0" Received: by mail-pf1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-718d704704aso3833923b3a.3 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:24:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; t=1727713471; x=1728318271; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MrGt5Upc5o7Dx2xzHjGWOE9OwgSldZ92rzSBdwBzh2I=; b=tmGS/2D0SyEt28R9KcRrTVW2f82r8MO+HN5f9H54srl9AMXxScqpHeaN1h4qOkULqi /LHrIm2FSE5nwQ4zXCJdAaTGqNHacleLPkGLZmEiS8ga+r+anMhS8ssWuI1Ku385lILD +IascO1gmdNqqzLYSOlS94YBL6mLI03SdogvE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727713471; x=1728318271; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=MrGt5Upc5o7Dx2xzHjGWOE9OwgSldZ92rzSBdwBzh2I=; b=ZU/OUfZdcZOwwcpgs1A+JGZHQC3d63n4gGAdiuQkS9ofNnY11e6lLamgaYVvVr5/Nn oXzkk8+3zdbnumD3GJ3kHiOxmWXLSBr0Qq339Ib91uCtzoNt1FgGVvjzrQ6h7l4+fnam uyIkTb4WHpD2FdmlcKBnYbRe+UcFTHAf37kRzogP7ioQs75Enmhh5z4PZuZUolC9Dv9r GtxWvl9Ojh+DnvhUL80Zb3+K9eXhW2hi95Q074o7o3VCwwqRrPLwkVuVLJyjPtD5FW/w iympWTeD+4xNtYFSAqmQqvBct/eC/XqSijKAy3mV2iXfpU96dFIv5//aSCWMySK2f6V9 +rCw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU65bGf1Gj3sIut8q9+MMuH5Jwt4abbItNooBAn3EaHv/P6+otcKQO+FD/aVM5YEZrVmu3pzXziSKbaWTs=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwpK3SRpfyIm00YQyEEuifeSII8Enai8ktkq8B11J8wLViicXYX ab6+YTV38sCQvTy157M67FOgKagw5WcX5N1kFvLMIHWP5KLP+sW18yNvJ/lArDY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH+F3Tf3jKyC0qK2FNN1dLVKxM+uT+5rdmirqYof6Zm71lmr9+KaD68IeM8aJIQdD5MFKin8A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:d806:b0:1cf:9a86:56ac with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1d4fa68e8b2mr16968293637.17.1727713470897; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2620:11a:c019:0:65e:3115:2f58:c5fd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-71b2649f879sm6411451b3a.22.2024.09.30.09.24.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:24:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Joe Damato To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Joe Damato , Alexander Lobakin , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org (moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS), Jakub Kicinski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list), Paolo Abeni , Przemek Kitszel , Tony Nguyen Subject: [net-next v2 0/1] idpf: Don't hardcode napi_struct size Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:24:21 +0000 Message-Id: <20240930162422.288995-1-jdamato@fastly.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Greetings: Welcome to v2. This was previously an RFC [1], only changes applied are to the commit message. See changelog below. While working on an RFC which adds fields to napi_struct [2], I got a warning from the kernel test robot about tripping an assertion in idpf which seems to hardcode the size of napi_struct. The assertion was triggered after applying patch 3 from the RFC [3]. I did not want to the include this change in my RFC v4 because I wanted to keep the review of that RFC focused on the in core work instead, so I was hoping Intel would be OK to merge this (or a change which accomplishes the same thing). Please note: I do not have this hardware and thus have only compile tested this. Thanks, Joe v2: - No longer an RFC - Added Simon Horman's Reviewed-By tag [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240925180017.82891-1-jdamato@fastly.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240912100738.16567-1-jdamato@fastly.com/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240912100738.16567-6-jdamato@fastly.com/ Joe Damato (1): idpf: Don't hard code napi_struct size drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.h | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1