From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F131C2DA4; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727797528; cv=none; b=HKD2aU4/pRKMMMg0Zb6yrMfea5q4OB5nh87a7Y2jtjZ+JmoRtEOVCzaBA+CubVRuhjDxNdrAlAmAFgQmmLeDnpIIfCIkg/tdsn6MWDfoIZpr62gPN0C+yv2locRKeE64+GFy4Rb8iuWAW5UtIHOPJD6DCsb+kMGBdxTiw7zMC7U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727797528; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HKxl86d6npKrI4kMMT4X35cwFBejD519E/tSaDfV/Qo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VrhvrQkC+oaKW1fWPXwkhcWFHUKEPonYUjhKBSi49kQaa0av8v3havPLnvniuRsBe9KsqlLnELjTIomEj5onzMlCdLtxENIScXDMEcGkSKE6pw4JirsybDa1IM4u19GOwpPI2gV7r6N76XfELU1jWyOEJMtcUrEKzazhcoveJPE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=DWa9aVsc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="DWa9aVsc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1727797527; x=1759333527; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=HKxl86d6npKrI4kMMT4X35cwFBejD519E/tSaDfV/Qo=; b=DWa9aVsc8ySoxDaWFdrvVPVUqXZ4SQMi0ic7jq4aFvhRxFag6EO+guwE PL7cR4c/higOQmS+hYYvTxYnwu9jAKv5SwEBJHmsFVHTYZ3KSCzlX41iP wkBmsG8Eno4GFfKZ6pqEdG5iZZjRtv7Y+/C55U6lfPOJGB9wnbGk4S0NJ Y87qASBy8XomnlDUhZFRhoW23If6W/okinhOAxVw+CRfXZ8hgSylCxCDC fUQUSucg+7/LOfDJji3z1mYcVHIrJl2Nwj0/AZXGhsXaUqhwa0FYLu2ao yWM66YJieQWqfx/BatxOWYc4Xb1TIjE9S1a8hDmtSQGjr8MBZjVJZPiTr Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gMz7v7zvQiueFXjWRUB+gw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LVRiKxXiTIm5Kw/ujXTzDQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11212"; a="37534558" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,167,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="37534558" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Oct 2024 08:45:26 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: I2x18V+oT9COg4Vh27+nAg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: qQdbZXNbRxWKoHR1qCNeTQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,167,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="104530965" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2024 08:45:24 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1svf3x-000Qpx-0m; Tue, 01 Oct 2024 15:45:21 +0000 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 23:44:33 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Rosen Penev , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steve.glendinning@shawell.net Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/8] net: smsc91xx: move down struct members Message-ID: <202410012317.iGlUJQY9-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240930224056.354349-8-rosenp@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240930224056.354349-8-rosenp@gmail.com> Hi Rosen, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on net-next/main] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Rosen-Penev/net-smsc911x-use-devm_platform_ioremap_resource/20241001-064430 base: net-next/main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240930224056.354349-8-rosenp%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH net-next 7/8] net: smsc91xx: move down struct members config: i386-randconfig-001-20241001 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241001/202410012317.iGlUJQY9-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241001/202410012317.iGlUJQY9-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410012317.iGlUJQY9-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c: In function 'smsc911x_request_resources': >> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c:378:27: warning: variable 'reset_gpiod' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 378 | struct gpio_desc *reset_gpiod; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/reset_gpiod +378 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c 368 369 /* 370 * Request resources, currently just regulators. 371 * 372 * The SMSC911x has two power pins: vddvario and vdd33a, in designs where 373 * these are not always-on we need to request regulators to be turned on 374 * before we can try to access the device registers. 375 */ 376 static int smsc911x_request_resources(struct platform_device *pdev) 377 { > 378 struct gpio_desc *reset_gpiod; 379 struct clk *clk; 380 381 /* Request optional RESET GPIO */ 382 reset_gpiod = 383 devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); 384 385 /* Request clock */ 386 clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, NULL); 387 if (IS_ERR(clk)) 388 return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(clk), 389 "couldn't get clock"); 390 391 return 0; 392 } 393 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki