mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey@schaufler-ca.com, paul@paul-moore.com,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
	stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org, mic@digikod.net
Subject: [PATCH v4 04/13] Audit: maintain an lsm_prop in audit_context
Date: Wed,  9 Oct 2024 10:32:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241009173222.12219-5-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009173222.12219-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Replace the secid value stored in struct audit_context with a struct
lsm_prop. Change the code that uses this value to accommodate the
change. security_audit_rule_match() expects a lsm_prop, so existing
scaffolding can be removed. A call to security_secid_to_secctx()
is changed to security_lsmprop_to_secctx().  The call to
security_ipc_getsecid() is scaffolded.

A new function lsmprop_is_set() is introduced to identify whether
an lsm_prop contains a non-zero value.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 include/linux/security.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/audit.h           |  3 ++-
 kernel/auditsc.c         | 19 ++++++++-----------
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index f1c68e38b15d..5652baa4ca3c 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -291,6 +291,19 @@ static inline const char *kernel_load_data_id_str(enum kernel_load_data_id id)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
 
+/**
+ * lsmprop_is_set - report if there is a value in the lsm_prop
+ * @prop: Pointer to the exported LSM data
+ *
+ * Returns true if there is a value set, false otherwise
+ */
+static inline bool lsm_prop_is_set(struct lsm_prop *prop)
+{
+	const struct lsm_prop empty = {};
+
+	return !!memcmp(prop, &empty, sizeof(*prop));
+}
+
 int call_blocking_lsm_notifier(enum lsm_event event, void *data);
 int register_blocking_lsm_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
 int unregister_blocking_lsm_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
@@ -552,6 +565,17 @@ int security_bdev_setintegrity(struct block_device *bdev,
 			       size_t size);
 #else /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
 
+/**
+ * lsmprop_is_set - report if there is a value in the lsm_prop
+ * @prop: Pointer to the exported LSM data
+ *
+ * Returns true if there is a value set, false otherwise
+ */
+static inline bool lsm_prop_is_set(struct lsm_prop *prop)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 static inline int call_blocking_lsm_notifier(enum lsm_event event, void *data)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h
index a60d2840559e..d14924a887c9 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.h
+++ b/kernel/audit.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/audit.h>
+#include <linux/security.h>
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>
 #include <uapi/linux/mqueue.h>
 #include <linux/tty.h>
@@ -160,7 +161,7 @@ struct audit_context {
 			kuid_t			uid;
 			kgid_t			gid;
 			umode_t			mode;
-			u32			osid;
+			struct lsm_prop		oprop;
 			int			has_perm;
 			uid_t			perm_uid;
 			gid_t			perm_gid;
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index aaf672a962d6..e89499819817 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -724,9 +724,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
 				/* Find ipc objects that match */
 				if (!ctx || ctx->type != AUDIT_IPC)
 					break;
-				/* scaffolding */
-				prop.scaffold.secid = ctx->ipc.osid;
-				if (security_audit_rule_match(&prop,
+				if (security_audit_rule_match(&ctx->ipc.oprop,
 							      f->type, f->op,
 							      f->lsm_rule))
 					++result;
@@ -1394,19 +1392,17 @@ static void show_special(struct audit_context *context, int *call_panic)
 			audit_log_format(ab, " a%d=%lx", i,
 				context->socketcall.args[i]);
 		break; }
-	case AUDIT_IPC: {
-		u32 osid = context->ipc.osid;
-
+	case AUDIT_IPC:
 		audit_log_format(ab, "ouid=%u ogid=%u mode=%#ho",
 				 from_kuid(&init_user_ns, context->ipc.uid),
 				 from_kgid(&init_user_ns, context->ipc.gid),
 				 context->ipc.mode);
-		if (osid) {
+		if (lsm_prop_is_set(&context->ipc.oprop)) {
 			char *ctx = NULL;
 			u32 len;
 
-			if (security_secid_to_secctx(osid, &ctx, &len)) {
-				audit_log_format(ab, " osid=%u", osid);
+			if (security_lsmprop_to_secctx(&context->ipc.oprop,
+						       &ctx, &len)) {
 				*call_panic = 1;
 			} else {
 				audit_log_format(ab, " obj=%s", ctx);
@@ -1426,7 +1422,7 @@ static void show_special(struct audit_context *context, int *call_panic)
 				context->ipc.perm_gid,
 				context->ipc.perm_mode);
 		}
-		break; }
+		break;
 	case AUDIT_MQ_OPEN:
 		audit_log_format(ab,
 			"oflag=0x%x mode=%#ho mq_flags=0x%lx mq_maxmsg=%ld "
@@ -2642,7 +2638,8 @@ void __audit_ipc_obj(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
 	context->ipc.gid = ipcp->gid;
 	context->ipc.mode = ipcp->mode;
 	context->ipc.has_perm = 0;
-	security_ipc_getsecid(ipcp, &context->ipc.osid);
+	/* scaffolding */
+	security_ipc_getsecid(ipcp, &context->ipc.oprop.scaffold.secid);
 	context->type = AUDIT_IPC;
 }
 
-- 
2.46.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-09 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20241009173222.12219-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2024-10-09 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] LSM: Move away from secids Casey Schaufler
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 01/13] LSM: Add the lsm_prop data structure Casey Schaufler
2024-10-11  3:08     ` [PATCH v4 1/13] " Paul Moore
2024-10-11 15:45       ` Casey Schaufler
2024-10-11  7:36     ` [PATCH v4 01/13] " John Johansen
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 02/13] LSM: Use lsm_prop in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 03/13] LSM: Add lsmprop_to_secctx hook Casey Schaufler
2024-10-09 17:32   ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2024-10-11  3:08     ` [PATCH v4 4/13] Audit: maintain an lsm_prop in audit_context Paul Moore
2024-10-11 15:52       ` Casey Schaufler
2024-10-11 16:11         ` Paul Moore
2024-10-11 16:34           ` Casey Schaufler
2024-10-11 18:42             ` Paul Moore
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 05/13] LSM: Use lsm_prop in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2024-10-11  3:08     ` [PATCH v4 5/13] " Paul Moore
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 06/13] Audit: Update shutdown LSM data Casey Schaufler
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 07/13] LSM: Use lsm_prop in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 08/13] LSM: Use lsm_prop in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 09/13] Audit: use an lsm_prop in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 10/13] LSM: Create new security_cred_getlsmprop LSM hook Casey Schaufler
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 11/13] Audit: Change context data from secid to lsm_prop Casey Schaufler
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 12/13] Use lsm_prop for audit data Casey Schaufler
2024-10-09 17:32   ` [PATCH v4 13/13] LSM: Remove lsm_prop scaffolding Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241009173222.12219-5-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®