mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Klaus Kudielka <klaus.kudielka@gmail.com>,
	Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bsegall@google.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, efault@gmx.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	vschneid@redhat.com, wuyun.abel@bytedance.com,
	youssefesmat@chromium.org, spasswolf@web.de,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev,
	"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
	<regressions@leemhuis.info>,
	"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Re: [PATCH 17/24] sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:07:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241009180719.GD6937@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f82def74-a64a-4a05-c8d4-4eeb3e03d0c0@amd.com>

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 09:54:52PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> From 2e15180e18b51e9a2bc0d7050e915a70d2673a06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:24:35 +0000
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] sched/psi: Fixup PSI accounting with DELAY_DEQUEUE
> 
> After the merge of DELAY_DEQUEUE, "psi: inconsistent task state: warning
> were seen early into the boot. The crux of the matter is the fact that
> when a task is delayed, and the delayed task is then migrated, the
> wakeup context may not have any idea that the task was moved from its
> previous runqueue. This is the same reason psi_enqueue() considers
> only ...
> 
>      (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) && !(flags & ENQUEUE_MIGRATED)
> 
> ... as a wakeup. In case of a wakeup with migration, PSI forgoes
> clearing the TSK_IOWAIT flag which seems to be the issue I encountered
> in my splat previously.
> 
> With that said, the below diff, based on Peter's original approach
> currently seems to work for me in the sense that I have not seen the
> inconsistent state warning for a while now with my stress test.
> 
> Two key points of the approach are:
> 
> o It uses "p->migration_flags" to indicate a delayed entity has
>    migrated to another runqueue and convey the same during psi_enqueue().
> 
> o It adds ENQUEUE_WAKEUP flag alongside ENQUEUE_DELAYED for
>    enqueue_task() in ttwu_runnable() since psi_enqueue() needs to know of
>    a wakeup without migration to clear the TSK_IOWAIT flag it would have
>    set during psi_task_switch() for blocking task and going down the
>    stack for enqueue_task_fair(), there seem to be no other observer of
>    the ENQUEUE_WAKEUP flag other than psi_enqueue() in the requeue path.
> 
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>

Tested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

It fixes the warning and bogus pressure values after stressing it for
an hour or so with tons of cpu contention and cgroup movements.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-09 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-30 12:34 Bert Karwatzki
2024-09-22 15:45 ` [REGRESSION] " Chris Bainbridge
2024-09-22 16:01   ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-10-03  5:31   ` Klaus Kudielka
2024-10-04 11:10     ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-10-04 12:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-04 13:57         ` Johannes Weiner
2024-10-04 16:43           ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-10-08 15:38             ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-10-08 16:24               ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-10-09 18:07                 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2024-10-10  3:26                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-10-04 17:01         ` K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241009180719.GD6937@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chris.bainbridge@gmail.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=klaus.kudielka@gmail.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=spasswolf@web.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
    --cc=youssefesmat@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome