From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove domain_update_iommu_cap()
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 12:27:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011042722.73930-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011042722.73930-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
The attributes of a paging domain are initialized during the allocation
process, and any attempt to attach a domain that is not compatible will
result in a failure. Therefore, there is no need to update the domain
attributes at the time of domain attachment.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 1 -
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 83 -------------------------------------
2 files changed, 84 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
index 1497f3112b12..a4bff90c2d07 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
@@ -1232,7 +1232,6 @@ void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu);
void device_block_translation(struct device *dev);
int prepare_domain_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev);
-void domain_update_iommu_cap(struct dmar_domain *domain);
int dmar_ir_support(void);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index f6a3266b17d4..ada271e7be50 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -352,36 +352,6 @@ static bool iommu_paging_structure_coherency(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
ecap_smpwc(iommu->ecap) : ecap_coherent(iommu->ecap);
}
-static void domain_update_iommu_coherency(struct dmar_domain *domain)
-{
- struct iommu_domain_info *info;
- struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
- struct intel_iommu *iommu;
- bool found = false;
- unsigned long i;
-
- domain->iommu_coherency = true;
- xa_for_each(&domain->iommu_array, i, info) {
- found = true;
- if (!iommu_paging_structure_coherency(info->iommu)) {
- domain->iommu_coherency = false;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (found)
- return;
-
- /* No hardware attached; use lowest common denominator */
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
- if (!iommu_paging_structure_coherency(iommu)) {
- domain->iommu_coherency = false;
- break;
- }
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
static int domain_update_iommu_superpage(struct dmar_domain *domain,
struct intel_iommu *skip)
{
@@ -412,29 +382,6 @@ static int domain_update_iommu_superpage(struct dmar_domain *domain,
return fls(mask);
}
-static int domain_update_device_node(struct dmar_domain *domain)
-{
- struct device_domain_info *info;
- int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
- /*
- * There could possibly be multiple device numa nodes as devices
- * within the same domain may sit behind different IOMMUs. There
- * isn't perfect answer in such situation, so we select first
- * come first served policy.
- */
- nid = dev_to_node(info->dev);
- if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
- break;
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
-
- return nid;
-}
-
/* Return the super pagesize bitmap if supported. */
static unsigned long domain_super_pgsize_bitmap(struct dmar_domain *domain)
{
@@ -452,34 +399,6 @@ static unsigned long domain_super_pgsize_bitmap(struct dmar_domain *domain)
return bitmap;
}
-/* Some capabilities may be different across iommus */
-void domain_update_iommu_cap(struct dmar_domain *domain)
-{
- domain_update_iommu_coherency(domain);
- domain->iommu_superpage = domain_update_iommu_superpage(domain, NULL);
-
- /*
- * If RHSA is missing, we should default to the device numa domain
- * as fall back.
- */
- if (domain->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- domain->nid = domain_update_device_node(domain);
-
- /*
- * First-level translation restricts the input-address to a
- * canonical address (i.e., address bits 63:N have the same
- * value as address bit [N-1], where N is 48-bits with 4-level
- * paging and 57-bits with 5-level paging). Hence, skip bit
- * [N-1].
- */
- if (domain->use_first_level)
- domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = __DOMAIN_MAX_ADDR(domain->gaw - 1);
- else
- domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = __DOMAIN_MAX_ADDR(domain->gaw);
-
- domain->domain.pgsize_bitmap |= domain_super_pgsize_bitmap(domain);
-}
-
struct context_entry *iommu_context_addr(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u8 bus,
u8 devfn, int alloc)
{
@@ -1493,7 +1412,6 @@ int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu)
ret = xa_err(curr) ? : -EBUSY;
goto err_clear;
}
- domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
return 0;
@@ -1519,7 +1437,6 @@ void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu)
clear_bit(info->did, iommu->domain_ids);
xa_erase(&domain->iommu_array, iommu->seq_id);
domain->nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
- domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
kfree(info);
}
spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 4:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 4:27 [PATCH 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Add domain_alloc_paging support Lu Baolu
2024-10-11 4:27 ` [PATCH 1/7] " Lu Baolu
2024-10-11 13:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-11 16:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-14 0:53 ` Baolu Lu
2024-10-14 19:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-11 4:27 ` [PATCH 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove unused domain_alloc callback Lu Baolu
2024-10-11 16:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-11 4:27 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Enhance compatibility check for paging domain attach Lu Baolu
2024-10-11 16:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-14 1:25 ` Baolu Lu
2024-10-14 19:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-15 2:52 ` Baolu Lu
2024-10-15 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-16 1:46 ` Baolu Lu
2024-10-11 4:27 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2024-10-11 16:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove domain_update_iommu_cap() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-11 4:27 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove domain_update_iommu_superpage() Lu Baolu
2024-10-11 16:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-11 4:27 ` [PATCH 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Refactor first_level_by_default() Lu Baolu
2024-10-11 16:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-11 4:27 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Refine intel_iommu_domain_alloc_user() Lu Baolu
2024-10-11 11:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-11 16:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011042722.73930-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®