From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf probe: Correct demangled symbols in C++ program
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:14:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241012141432.877894-1-leo.yan@arm.com> (raw)
An issue can be observed when probe C++ demangled symbol with steps:
# nm test_cpp_mangle | grep print_data
0000000000000c94 t _GLOBAL__sub_I__Z10print_datai
0000000000000afc T _Z10print_datai
0000000000000b38 T _Z10print_dataR5Point
# perf probe -x /home/niayan01/test_cpp_mangle -F --demangle
...
print_data(Point&)
print_data(int)
...
# perf --debug verbose=3 probe -x test_cpp_mangle --add "test=print_data(int)"
probe-definition(0): test=print_data(int)
symbol:print_data(int) file:(null) line:0 offset:0 return:0 lazy:(null)
0 arguments
Open Debuginfo file: /home/niayan01/test_cpp_mangle
Try to find probe point from debuginfo.
Symbol print_data(int) address found : afc
Matched function: print_data [2ccf]
Probe point found: print_data+0
Found 1 probe_trace_events.
Opening /sys/kernel/tracing//uprobe_events write=1
Opening /sys/kernel/tracing//README write=0
Writing event: p:probe_test_cpp_mangle/test /home/niayan01/test_cpp_mangle:0xb38
...
When tried to probe symbol "print_data(int)", the log shows:
Symbol print_data(int) address found : afc
The found address is 0xafc - which is right with verifying the output
result from nm. Afterwards when write event, the command uses offset
0xb38 in the last log, which is a wrong address.
The dwarf_diename() gets a common function name, in above case, it
returns string "print_data". As a result, the tool parses the offset
based on the common name. This leads to probe at the wrong symbol
"print_data(Point&)".
To fix the issue, use the die_get_linkage_name() function to retrieve
the distinct linkage name - this is the mangled name for the C++ case.
Based on this unique name, the tool can get a correct offset for
probing. Based on DWARF doc, it is possible the linkage name is missed
in the DIE, it rolls back to use dwarf_diename().
After:
# perf --debug verbose=3 probe -x test_cpp_mangle --add "test=print_data(int)"
probe-definition(0): test=print_data(int)
symbol:print_data(int) file:(null) line:0 offset:0 return:0 lazy:(null)
0 arguments
Open Debuginfo file: /home/niayan01/test_cpp_mangle
Try to find probe point from debuginfo.
Symbol print_data(int) address found : afc
Matched function: print_data [2d06]
Probe point found: print_data+0
Found 1 probe_trace_events.
Opening /sys/kernel/tracing//uprobe_events write=1
Opening /sys/kernel/tracing//README write=0
Writing event: p:probe_test_cpp_mangle/test /home/niayan01/test_cpp_mangle:0xafc
Added new event:
probe_test_cpp_mangle:test (on print_data(int) in /home/niayan01/test_cpp_mangle)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe_test_cpp_mangle:test -aR sleep 1
# perf --debug verbose=3 probe -x test_cpp_mangle --add "test2=print_data(Point&)"
probe-definition(0): test2=print_data(Point&)
symbol:print_data(Point&) file:(null) line:0 offset:0 return:0 lazy:(null)
0 arguments
Open Debuginfo file: /home/niayan01/test_cpp_mangle
Try to find probe point from debuginfo.
Symbol print_data(Point&) address found : b38
Matched function: print_data [2ccf]
Probe point found: print_data+0
Found 1 probe_trace_events.
Opening /sys/kernel/tracing//uprobe_events write=1
Parsing probe_events: p:probe_test_cpp_mangle/test /home/niayan01/test_cpp_mangle:0x0000000000000afc
Group:probe_test_cpp_mangle Event:test probe:p
Opening /sys/kernel/tracing//README write=0
Writing event: p:probe_test_cpp_mangle/test2 /home/niayan01/test_cpp_mangle:0xb38
Added new event:
probe_test_cpp_mangle:test2 (on print_data(Point&) in /home/niayan01/test_cpp_mangle)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe_test_cpp_mangle:test2 -aR sleep 1
Fixes: fb1587d869a3 ("perf probe: List probes with line number and file name")
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
---
tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
index 630e16c54ed5..498ccfb0be6f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
@@ -1583,8 +1583,21 @@ int debuginfo__find_probe_point(struct debuginfo *dbg, u64 addr,
/* Find a corresponding function (name, baseline and baseaddr) */
if (die_find_realfunc(&cudie, (Dwarf_Addr)addr, &spdie)) {
- /* Get function entry information */
- func = basefunc = dwarf_diename(&spdie);
+ /*
+ * Get function entry information.
+ *
+ * As described in the document DWARF Debugging Information
+ * Format Version 5, section 2.22 Linkage Names, "mangled names,
+ * are used in various ways, ... to distinguish multiple
+ * entities that have the same name".
+ *
+ * Firstly try to get distinct linkage name, if fail then
+ * rollback to get associated name in DIE.
+ */
+ func = basefunc = die_get_linkage_name(&spdie);
+ if (!func)
+ func = basefunc = dwarf_diename(&spdie);
+
if (!func ||
die_entrypc(&spdie, &baseaddr) != 0 ||
dwarf_decl_line(&spdie, &baseline) != 0) {
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-12 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 14:14 Leo Yan [this message]
2024-10-14 0:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-10-18 15:20 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241012141432.877894-1-leo.yan@arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®