From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8566333998; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728901121; cv=none; b=lvUOLLhh7HnBLl37IKz66Gg4yYf1PpZzWJd46ITkrWR2NfAgE2l/9ijSDAFo/BeK0HQEuRxyXkpMopDv+CFcJmk/LklDSBBNHclC3FcUg1UJsTiintLBZZ5KT/Db3XEDXKDzgHkSyyEzi4KP1UsftXqfJrOa8W3n7Iw49hu31OM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728901121; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/LxmiqMGTBpLRueUOAkbswRnRp2fGGnrDCliMJv5WMI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=P4jhBUmkGq+hneH4rid0dGgze/0ihIj7z+D5BVcBFH/SVB4xHbeobzXIugqUBLuf3tBuozeU/s/h4Au9TDdT8Y130LUK04hoDiC8BdKn9VnRiNGBQNKxZzsJN9z3Fsl+TmHDg3UCV986susQAfROEyv+ozxv0fg5X3YVB608V9g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=F14vMr94; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="F14vMr94" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1F87C4CEC3; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:18:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728901119; bh=/LxmiqMGTBpLRueUOAkbswRnRp2fGGnrDCliMJv5WMI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=F14vMr94gZPsWIKrgdXC49lx96g7jrPuXLgm3jy6/va/205tTFX8j1PmUmAaoPadR SU9tigi7QeES4NsfdZz6YpqK17+ThJWTFKTfVUzEkNGmHPm1VDrxebiA/kXPUr/o4D CkFhAXhsd8JXi/vSLhl+5t9qJRQuziLET4v1WyrqXkla3M+UZf0DiUcLxU5Hjvk2wB ydckSf7ZTk10n6yTpOP4MI0Hh8VCWOD4jd1OOAeIg0ruQi3ILdUG9dyOep76PSuIeY EtXqPQh2uuKlnxWDWm2RwDCT1DzIHQlSAExqcjB7ueoHtP3ZXSS1SgkxPrywEyL8d5 kmm7N6hJW0INw== Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:18:34 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Song Liu Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, kpsingh@kernel.org, mattbobrowski@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] fs/xattr: bpf: Introduce security.bpf xattr name prefix Message-ID: <20241014-obstgarten-zeigen-1c6576a6034f@brauner> References: <20241002214637.3625277-1-song@kernel.org> <20241002214637.3625277-2-song@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241002214637.3625277-2-song@kernel.org> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > Introduct new xattr name prefix security.bpf, and enable reading these > xattrs from bpf kfuncs bpf_get_[file|dentry]_xattr(). Note that > "security.bpf" could be the name of the xattr or the prefix of the > name. For example, both "security.bpf" and "security.bpf.xxx" are > valid xattr name; while "security.bpfxxx" is not valid. > > Signed-off-by: Song Liu > --- Acked-by: Christian Brauner