From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: "Olivier Masse" <olivier.masse@nxp.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Yong Wu" <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
"T . J . Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Sumit Garg" <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com,
"Jens Wiklander" <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:15:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241015101716.740829-1-jens.wiklander@linaro.org> (raw)
Hi,
This patch set allocates the restricted DMA-bufs via the TEE subsystem.
This a complete rewrite compared to the previous patch set [1], and other
earlier proposals [2] and [3] with a separate restricted heap.
The TEE subsystem handles the DMA-buf allocations since it is the TEE
(OP-TEE, AMD-TEE, TS-TEE, or a future QTEE) which sets up the restrictions
for the memory used for the DMA-bufs.
I've added a new IOCTL, TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC, to allocate the restricted
DMA-bufs. This new IOCTL reaches the backend TEE driver, allowing it to
choose how to allocate the restricted physical memory.
TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC is quite similar to TEE_IOC_SHM_ALLOC so it's tempting
to extend TEE_IOC_SHM_ALLOC with two new flags
TEE_IOC_SHM_FLAG_SECURE_VIDEO and TEE_IOC_SHM_FLAG_SECURE_TRUSTED_UI for
the same feature. However, it might be a bit confusing since
TEE_IOC_SHM_ALLOC only returns an anonymous file descriptor, but
TEE_IOC_SHM_FLAG_SECURE_VIDEO and TEE_IOC_SHM_FLAG_SECURE_TRUSTED_UI would
return a DMA-buf file descriptor instead. What do others think?
This can be tested on QEMU with the following steps:
repo init -u https://github.com/jenswi-linaro/manifest.git -m qemu_v8.xml \
-b prototype/sdp-v2
repo sync -j8
cd build
make toolchains -j4
make all -j$(nproc)
make run-only
# login and at the prompt:
xtest --sdp-basic
https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/prerequisites.html
list dependencies needed to build the above.
The tests are pretty basic, mostly checking that a Trusted Application in
the secure world can access and manipulate the memory. There are also some
negative tests for out of bounds buffers etc.
Thanks,
Jens
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240830070351.2855919-1-jens.wiklander@linaro.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20240515112308.10171-1-yong.wu@mediatek.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220805135330.970-1-olivier.masse@nxp.com/
Changes since the V1 RFC:
* Based on v6.11
* Complete rewrite, replacing the restricted heap with TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC
Changes since Olivier's post [2]:
* Based on Yong Wu's post [1] where much of dma-buf handling is done in
the generic restricted heap
* Simplifications and cleanup
* New commit message for "dma-buf: heaps: add Linaro restricted dmabuf heap
support"
* Replaced the word "secure" with "restricted" where applicable
Jens Wiklander (2):
tee: add restricted memory allocation
optee: support restricted memory allocation
drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 21 ++++
drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 6 +
drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h | 35 ++++++
drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 45 ++++++-
drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 33 ++++-
drivers/tee/tee_private.h | 2 +
drivers/tee/tee_rstmem.c | 200 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 2 +
drivers/tee/tee_shm_pool.c | 69 ++++++++++-
include/linux/tee_core.h | 6 +
include/linux/tee_drv.h | 9 ++
include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 33 ++++-
13 files changed, 455 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/tee/tee_rstmem.c
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-15 10:15 Jens Wiklander [this message]
2024-10-15 10:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] tee: add restricted memory allocation Jens Wiklander
2024-10-15 10:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] optee: support " Jens Wiklander
2024-10-17 11:00 ` Sumit Garg
2024-10-18 15:48 ` Jens Wiklander
2024-10-17 10:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations Sumit Garg
2024-10-18 15:16 ` Jens Wiklander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241015101716.740829-1-jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--to=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=olivier.masse@nxp.com \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®