From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Narasimhan.V@amd.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 23:41:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241016154152.1376492-1-feng.tang@intel.com> (raw)
Danilo Krummrich's patch [1] raised one problem about krealloc() that
its caller doesn't pass the old request size, say the object is 64
bytes kmalloc one, but caller originally only requested 48 bytes. Then
when krealloc() shrinks or grows in the same object, or allocate a new
bigger object, it lacks this 'original size' information to do accurate
data preserving or zeroing (when __GFP_ZERO is set).
Thus with slub debug redzone and object tracking enabled, parts of the
object after krealloc() might contain redzone data instead of zeroes,
which is violating the __GFP_ZERO guarantees. Good thing is in this
case, kmalloc caches do have this 'orig_size' feature, which could be
used to improve the situation here.
To make the 'orig_size' accurate, we adjust some kasan/slub meta data
handling. Also add a slub kunit test case for krealloc().
Many thanks to syzbot and V, Narasimhan for detecting issues of the
v2 patches.
This is again linux-slab tree's 'for-6.13/fixes' branch
[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240812223707.32049-1-dakr@kernel.org/
Thanks,
Feng
Changelog:
Since v2:
* Fix NULL pointer issue related to big kmalloc object which has
no associated slab (V, Narasimhan, syzbot)
* Fix issue related handling for kfence allocated object (syzbot,
Marco Elver)
* drop the 0001 and 0003 patch whch have been merged to slab tree
Since v1:
* Drop the patch changing generic kunit code from this patchset,
and will send it separately.
* Separate the krealloc moving form slab_common.c to slub.c to a
new patch for better review (Danilo/Vlastimil)
* Improve commit log and comments (Vlastimil/Danilo)
* Rework the kunit test case to remove its dependency over
slub_debug (which is incomplete in v1) (Vlastimil)
* Add ack and review tag from developers.
Feng Tang (3):
mm/slub: Consider kfence case for get_orig_size()
mm/slub: Improve redzone check and zeroing for krealloc()
mm/slub, kunit: Add testcase for krealloc redzone and zeroing
lib/slub_kunit.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/slub.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--
2.27.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-16 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-16 15:41 Feng Tang [this message]
2024-10-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/slub: Consider kfence case for get_orig_size() Feng Tang
2024-11-14 13:38 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2024-10-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/slub: Improve redzone check and zeroing for krealloc() Feng Tang
2024-11-14 13:34 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2024-11-15 13:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/slub, kunit: Add testcase for krealloc redzone and zeroing Feng Tang
2024-10-18 9:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241016154152.1376492-1-feng.tang@intel.com \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Narasimhan.V@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®