From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C3D71DA61E for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729169086; cv=none; b=KaI3ZQPUpNgkxi04yHgEp4FWw+aCmTaKkF1ntTmbe84jDA2+KhV5Fatt4oI0rxCX0TFIs+J0DpRQqUm5I+RWE82+xfnneYyMx7uiDo9lAE8OwHDAaATqLK/VpUxKFF598KWvOkRBvKTg54+avL9feppv5kulUuUD0/ueWhJPOSw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729169086; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xod92abkKPjsuq2xCVMjFOc7B3vn3PWges1C+7+ZYEg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kBrjcwtatVzMq3vO+trawarVi6L6JBJT0Rlur8RCpzja/dgs+Mpa6B0HwIfDPkWRkj8E7w1De6A3JbIfW58wkTEVeJyYqcEwy+kcvNVZKaCvQUwcDyWul0sRwzfCprIassX4eyMtUzJeR11v3wLuhCfK4ZhhZOr7NLKr4gmCsc0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=MT38eNw/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="MT38eNw/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1729169081; bh=xod92abkKPjsuq2xCVMjFOc7B3vn3PWges1C+7+ZYEg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MT38eNw/HsuRcTAnrwWxXJImzpQGmpdUEiSzcjpgCgWjrps5+rzZ3zSSr3oXSZfSo tOpk6sf3U+6/G3qv81iw5lwcxULnV+1a4oi9kluJJCE1Ocbk9oV3gMfEYMqD+OeSNi SJWTg4sizGCCSuaKzLk7LpTy9qd+oAyxMGro/QOmWVgVbcMofRkmC4RVbVVejkG/a8 UBErYLUSP2aAP/3nbv9uRMZzaR9J/wCVysjF7A1VLAToOONyXVPHgKGbt21ej2I5Vm 3j0gcYAVsErfcJmJ3pzCgXNwyUIoQBokyuT4PbFKOmj6WeIVv4c7PIe1Dr4C8hwNBX Y1IkjPBOslVuw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:2c:6930:5cf4:84a1:2763:fe0d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01C6F17E35F5; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 14:44:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 14:44:38 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: =?UTF-8?B?QWRyacOhbg==?= Larumbe Cc: Rob Herring , Steven Price , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Philipp Zabel , kernel@collabora.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/panfrost: Replace DRM driver allocation method with newer one Message-ID: <20241017144438.257aaa76@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: <20241014233758.994861-1-adrian.larumbe@collabora.com> References: <20241014233758.994861-1-adrian.larumbe@collabora.com> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:31:36 +0100 Adri=C3=A1n Larumbe wrote: > Drop the deprecated DRM driver allocation method in favour of > devm_drm_dev_alloc(). Overall just make it the same as in Panthor. > Also discard now superfluous generic and platform device pointers inside > the main panfrost device structure. >=20 > Some ancient checkpatch issues unearthed as a result of these changes > were also fixed, like lines too long or double assignment in one line. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Adri=C3=A1n Larumbe Acked-by: Boris Brezillon I didn't do a thorough review of the diff, but I'm assuming it's correct if the driver compiles. BTW, I don't see it done in this series, but it might be good to also turn devm_ calls into drmm_ ones, and dev_ into drm_.